Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 05/08/2026 2:57:16 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
Prince William has a famously warm rapport with his wife Kate Middleton and the couple's three children, but according to royal biographer Christopher Andersen, his relationship with his father, King Charles, can be more complicated.
Andersen, who recently published a book about the Princess of Wales, said William is "capable of great bellowing tantrums" and sometimes "terrifies" the 77-year-old monarch.
"When he gets frustrated, he does resort to shouting [at the king]," a former staff member of Highgrove House, Charles's country estate, told Andersen, per Page Six. "William has a huge, booming voice. Much louder than his father’s, so it’s not something you soon forget."
(Excerpt) Read more at instyle.com ...
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
These people need to get real jobs.
Charles is a beta. Whatever.
“When he gets frustrated, he does resort to shouting [at the king],” a former staff member of Highgrove House, Charles’s country estate, told Andersen, per Page Six. “William has a huge, booming voice. Much louder than his father’s, so it’s not something you soon forget.” I wish I could’ve been there.
Its just a bad reality show where the actors are paid far too much. It was more interesting when the kids were all younger and sleeping around and stuff. They should add a couple whores, 2 junkies, and 4 drunks then maybe it would be interesting again.
Does anyone remember the show
called I Wanna Marry “Harry”, which aired in 2014. While produced by an American company (Ryan Seacrest Productions) for Fox, it was filmed in the UK, often featured on British television (ITV2), and covered by the BBC as a “shameless” show.
Twelve American women were convinced they were competing for the love of Prince Harry, but the bachelor was actually Matthew Hicks, an environmental consultant who resembled the Prince.
Ruse: Contestants were brought to a stately home in the UK and led to believe in the royal courtship through staged security incidents and paparazzi, according to The Guardian.
Outcome: The show was a ratings failure and was pulled after four episodes in the US, but aired in full elsewhere.
Not long after Harry married a tv actress, and went on a bunch of we want our privacy tours.
I would not be surprised if the English Monarchy is dead before I am
Anderson wants to sell books. Prince William has been in the public eye his whole life, and there is no record of him using his booming voice by anyone (disaffected staff, old girlfriends, college mates). There is the one report of him pulling off Harry’s necklace and tossing him at the dog dish, related in the book that he had to sell as well. If the incident had to do with how Meghan treated Princess Charlotte (William’s daughter), then Harry had it coming anyway. William always appears composed, and I believe it is a good sign that he is willing to tell the King things that the King may not want to hear.
> It’s just a bad reality show where the actors are paid far too much. <
True that. I’m in favor of getting rid of the whole lot. However, someone here on FR once made an interesting point. As commander-in-chief, the monarch is the last line of defense against a social calamity.
The monarch has done nothing to stop the Muslim invasion. But well, okay. Maybe keep the monarch and his immediate family on the dole. But all the princes, dukes, grand poobahs, etc. - tell them to go out and get a real job.
As madprof98 suggested.
Prince Harry details physical attack by brother William in new book
I already detailed Harry’s snit in my original post. Harry is unreliable, and had to add sensationalism to sell books. This is the same book where he details his blue todger. Numerous contradictions were found in the book, which South Park right lampooned as “Wauuuuugh!”
No one has ever said “No” to the King formerly known as Prince. William has cause to feel frustrated and not heard. He looks all around him at the terrible mess over which he and his family will have to preside, possibly to its collapse through no fault of his, if things don’t start to turn around quickly.
Still, best to find a better way to communicate. The two of them need to remain solid partners.
Very hopeful that Farage’s Reform party can help return the tide to British cultural traditions honed over the past 1,000 years, stemming the advance of Islamism in UK.
The British royalty will likely not last another generation. They just got rid of peerage in the House of Lords, so the writing is on the wall.
The case for that is straightforward: hereditary privilege as a principle of governance or social organization is flatly incompatible with meritocratic and "democratic" values (note the quotes) that most British citizens would affirm in every other context.
You cannot coherently believe that people should rise on ability and effort while also maintaining that one family is uniquely fitted by birth to occupy a ceremonial apex of national life.
IF I HAD DONE THE PHYSICAL ATTACK-—HE WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO”WRITE A BOOK”.
I AM 86 & STILL FEMALE
HARRY DISGUSTS ME MARKLE EVEN MORE
King Willy. This should be good. Maybe he can rally what’s left of them to save the Brits.
If you got rid of the Monarchy the whole place would fly apart. As little as it is it is the only now mostly theoretical constraint on the excesses of Parliament.
Every day the UK demonstrates why the Founding Fathers were suspicious of democracy.
Never understood the fascination with these inbreds.
There is something to be said for raising a champion. Horse breeders do it; parents of Olympic athletes do it; Tiger Woods' father did it; the Rockefeller's did it; John and Abigail Adams did it. There is no substitute for steeping the leading members of a family in the history and expectations of a long-established culture or way of life, as long as they show an aptitude for it.
Obviously over the centuries there were many bad seeds and weak kings; but the concept needn't be thrown out completely.
As our nation has recently orgied on overimmigration, anti-authoritarianism, atheism and DEI, we are facing real, substantial demographic threats to democracy, which the founders recognized as several wolves and a lamb deciding what to have for lunch—or words to that effect. So it's not as if our system is foolproof, either.
Good point. But it is interesting to note that the House of Commons could get rid of the monarchy tomorrow if they so wished.
Maybe they don’t because there’d be a public outcry - 58% of the British population still supports the institution. I suppose that number will fall as more Muslims flood the country, and older Brits die off.
Personally, I’d like to see a military coup in the UK. That’s about the only thing that will save the country now.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.