Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 03/30/2026 6:04:43 AM PDT by DFG
California Democrats have a problem with their leading candidates. One doesn’t live in the state but allegedly lived, in the euphemistic sense, with a Chinese spy. Another has the looks and personality of a distempered boar and can’t stop screaming at staffers, reporters and anyone late with her lunch. A third is a billionaire who convenes events at luxury hotels to explain how he’ll fight against the billionaires for the working class he sometimes reads about in the paper.
And those are their most popular candidates.
But since this is California, the real problem is that all of those candidates are all the wrong color. Their skin lacks melanin. Two of them can’t even tan. Their distant ancestors probably came here on the Mayflower or some other European sailing vessel. Basically they’re white.
Much too white.
There are other more ‘diverse’ candidates like a Latino former Los Angeles mayor, a Chinese State Controller, a Black Jewish school superintendent, and Biden’s former Latino Secretary of Health and Human Services (he’s still Latino, but a former secretary), but the public isn’t interested in voting for them or giving them money and so they’re not viable candidates.
What are the Democrats to do when their voters just aren’t interested in diversity?
The crisis of the #TooWhite Democrat ticket came to a head when USC was forced to cancel the first gubernatorial debate because all of the candidates were white and mostly male. If the Oscars, the Golden Globes and hockey had to be revamped because there were too many white people, shouldn’t the candidates for the governorship of a diverse state be diverse?
The problem is that the voters don’t agree which means that democracy is racist.
Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas, who insists he is not white, Senate President Monique Limon, who has also achieved the great distinction of not being white despite probably not being able to tan, along with the leaders of the Latino, Black, Asian, LGBTQ and numerous other caucuses, all signed a letter claiming that there was “growing alarm from California voters” because “every excluded leading candidate… is a person of color” and warned that if “USC does not do the right thing, we call on California voters to boycott this debate.” And then probably the election.
The candidates that the diverse leaders of the state claimed were excluded are polling respectively at 3%, 3%, 1% and 1%. The selection process of the gubernatorial debate that they claimed was biased is indeed biased. It’s biased against politicians polling between 1% and 3%.
Together all the diverse candidates add up to 8%. California voters aren’t ‘alarmed’, they’re not interested in the ‘diverse’ candidates who talk a lot about their diverse backgrounds as the children of immigrants who pulled themselves up by their bootstraps to becoming millionaire state officials. (One of the septuagenarian diverse candidates recently got to keep his $3.5 million mansion in the divorce, another diverse candidate has a net worth of over $7 million.)
Only the Latino candidates even crack 3%. The Black and Chinese candidates are at 1%.
Whose fault is this? If voters don’t like diverse candidates, what can be done to cure them? Gunpoint Drag Queen Story Hour? Electroshock therapy accompanied by Candace Owens podcasts? Mandatory tickets to WNBA games held in North Korean labor camps? Netflix?
Golden State Democrats have weeks in which to either convince voters that they need to be more diverse in their political choices or just do what the Oscars did and import a bunch of outsiders and make them voters in order to rebalance the system to manufacture diversity.
The problem with Plan B is that’s been the official policy of California Democrats for the last 35 years. Its elected officials have wrecked the state, bankrupted it, threatened law enforcement with several penalties and fought a near civil war against the federal government in order to keep the border open and fill every part of it with illegal aliens. Especially illegal alien criminals.
California Democrats also dismantled any kind of voter security measures and made it possible for a Venezuelan here for three weeks to still vote. And, despite all that, the party is too white.
What else is a party that already bitterly clings to demographic replacement supposed to do?
Opponents of the USC debate keep speaking in the name of “democracy” and “voters” when those are their leading obstacles. The only way to save California’s diversity is to get rid of the voters and democracy in the name of democracy and the voters because that’s what they would want if they weren’t such miserable racists. Sometimes you have to kill democracy to save it.
Democrats have flirted with various ways of sidelining democracy, like enabling voter fraud, inviting in illegal aliens to create ‘ghost districts’, ranked choice voting which gave us Zohran Mamdani, and late ballot dumps which gave us Karen Bass in Los Angeles and Katie Wilson in Seattle, but the current California candidate diversity crisis can’t be fixed with half-measures.
There are other options on the horizon, like proportional representation, which would finally ensure that the Communist Party would have some official legislative seats, but 1% only gets you so much. The truly anti-racist position may be to recognize that democracy is racist.
If democracy leads to minority candidates polling at only 1% while white men take the rest of the voters, it becomes all too obvious that letting the people elect their leaders is systemically racist.
Sure, 32% of California’s registered voters are Latino, 16% are Asian and 5% are black, making for a majority minority electorate that helped Democrats turn the state into a one-party system, but they must be suffering from internalized unconscious bias if they won’t vote for diversity.
When states are accused of systemic racism and disparate impact, they’re forced to sign consent decrees admitting to their racism and promising to implement specific policies to rig the system in favor of minorities. Each California voter must be forced to sign a similar consent decree acknowledging that he, she or xer was biased for not supporting minority candidates and promising to vote for them instead of whichever white person they were originally supporting.
Or California could just abolish elections. It’s the only truly anti-racist thing the state can do.
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Such are the ranks of the Hypocritocrats.
Brilliant.
The United States is NOT a “ democracy “.
It is a constitutional, representative REPUBLIC.
The globalists have succeeded, on an Orwellian level, in having most of the country repeating the “ democracy “ mantra.
White California liberals don’t like people of color. It’s obvious!
Of course it is; weakest to strongest is the strongest force there is in society. Its natural for humanity to improve itself or we would still be in the Stone Age.
Everything is racist.
Ah, yes, democracy!
Two wolves and a lamb debating over what is for lunch!
Or the democratic party can just implement the same system they use for delegates to their national convention. The democratic national convention delegates are chosen by quota. Read their selection process.
First a state must conduct a survey to determine how many people of each minority live in the state. Also how many of each gender. Then the makeup of each delegation must align with that survey. Some positions are designated by race, other by gender, some positions by both. The delegates chosen are not necesarily the one with the most votes, but the delegate with the most votes who matches the required demographics.
Yeah. And most don’t know the difference between a democrat and a Democrat, or maybe they’re just too lazy to push that little shift button.
The issue here is not that the election is too white --- it's too REPUBLICAN. The dems are gonna lose, and they're trying every scheme to prevent it. Why should it surprise anyone that they play the race card? They're trying to spout the fiction that DEI is more important than actual polling or voting, that if a white person wins he's illegitimate and should be recalled immediately. If the (R) wins, get ready for constant recall petitions, impeachments, lawsuits, protests, violence, all in the name of racism.
If the winner is (D) it wouldn't matter if he is (W).
Oh, I hope they urge voters to boycott the election. Then Republicans Hilton or Bianco will be the two candidates left after the jungle primary in June.
Problem is: Vote Fraud is rampant in California and THAT is what swings elections to Democrats.
...leading candidates. One doesn’t live in the state but allegedly lived, in the euphemistic sense, with a Chinese spy. Another has the looks and personality of a distempered boar and can’t stop screaming at staffers, reporters and anyone late with her lunch. A third is a billionaire who convenes events at luxury hotels to explain how he’ll fight against the billionaires for the working class he sometimes reads about in the paper... the real problem is that all of those candidates are all the wrong color... There are other more ‘diverse’ candidates like a Latino former Los Angeles mayor, a Chinese State Controller, a Black Jewish school superintendent, and Biden’s former Latino Secretary of Health and Human Services (he’s still Latino, but a former secretary), but the public isn’t interested in voting for them or giving them money and so they’re not viable candidates. What are the Democrats to do when their voters just aren’t interested in diversity?
If they're really devoted to their so-called values, Democrats should drink hemlock to fight racism, sexism, cisgenderism, colonization, etc.
... yet despite all those contortions and machinations the simple truth was uttered about a century ago ... it only matters who counts the votes.
As one prominent democrat said: ‘I would give you a tax break if I knew you’d spend it on the right things.’
Could always pull a Horizontal - put her in charge since Brandon kicked the bucket while in office. ANOINT someone. Voting not required.
Hoisted by their own petard.
Liberals don’t know what to do when their schemes blow up in their faces. That is when they don’t have the power to kill their enemies.
Read
Luckily I reside in a constitutional republic.
Good point! Demcrats need to take a principled stand and BOYCOTT the 2026 election!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.