Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 01/26/2026 3:49:44 AM PST by Enterprise
Gavin Newsom usually detests the Second Amendment, but for the purpose of defaming an ICE officer after another shooting in Minneapolis, he suddenly supports it wholeheartedly. Isn't that convenient?
(Excerpt) Read more at twitchy.com ...
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Response from Kostos Moros:
"The most fun part is we can now cite this in the SB2 litigation. Newsom admits banning carry at protests, as CA has done under his watch, is unconstitutional."
"You literally signed a bill into law in CA banning carry at protests! And you support existing laws banning the pistol Pretti was carrying for several different reasons."
So, let me update leftist mantra. Only the police and military should have guns. And people who disagree with Trump and his deportation efforts.
These people aren’t protesting. They’re interfering.
Newsome didn’t forget. He knows the mockingbird media won’t call him on it.
We’re in the middle of a revolution, literally. If any of the events happen in an area where we conservatives live, we must show up to outnumber these marxists. There has to be some communication system that can send those who sign up an alert to be there.
Oopsie. America haters always be hoisting themselves up on their own petards. But they seem to enjoy the sensation.
Correct.
They’re not protestors. They’re accomplices.
Don’t bother him with details!
Freedom of speech -- here is a soap box. Go stand on this and tell the world how much you hate Trump.
Peaceable assembly -- there is a spot over there. You and your friends can stand there and hold signs telling the world how much you hate Trump.
Blowing whistles in peoples' faces? Laying hands on law enforcement? Blocking traffic? Trying to run people over? There is no Constitutional protection for these things.
MN AG Ellison is party to a lawsuit that argues you shouldn’t be able to bring a firearm to a political event/protest.
These tards turn on a dime when it suits them.
“MN AG Ellison is party to a lawsuit that argues you shouldn’t be able to bring a firearm to a political event/protest.”
When the GA carry permit was a paper card, printed on the back was a list of situations one was not “licensed” to carry. A “public gathering” was one such place. It was vague, but described as a political rally. That is no longer printed on the permit. In fact, a permit is no longer required in GA, so I can’t say where all this stands now.
Why would you show up to argue with these crazies while they attack ICE officers? What do you expect to achieve?
Yeah, you’re right. I’ll just wait until they come to the house for me and my family. It’s headed that way anyway, isn’t it? (/S)
Bring guns to a revolution, but to a protest or an interference is merely demonstrating your impotence and your movement’s validity.
Reminds me of a scene in LETHAL WEAPON in which under cover cop Mel Gibson dressed as a bum sitting in a police station removes his firearm from his pocket. Someone sees it and screams “GUN!” and all he!! breaks lose for a few minutes.
The left climb3d and conquered mt hypocrisy when their far left news media for a couple days now all of a sudden became all gung ho in favor of second amendment rights
The left have zero shame! They can’t even spell the word!
No. It’s not.
Too much hair gel, Gavin, remember ‘A little dab will do ya’.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.