Charlie Kirk’s Best Friend Debunks the Conspiracy Theories

The Conservative Treehouse - The Last Refuge ^ | September 23, 2025 | Sundance

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Andrew Kolvet, the Executive Producer of The Charlie Kirk Show was Charlie’s best friend. Following the memorial service he sat down for a lengthy podcast interview with Alex Clark. WATCH:

Reference points:
0:00 intro
1:38 Charlie’s last weeks
3:59 Charlie’s urge for International travels
4:38 His favorite form of exercise
5:50 Sharing the Gospel in Tokyo
6:55 Conservative infighting about Israel

15:22 Prepping Erika for Opportunists
18:04 Andrew’s “out-of-body” experience
20:06 How Charlie treated women
22:14 Andrew calls Charlie a “prophet”
24:05 Erika’s confidence in Charlie’s investigation
26:29 Charlie’s problems with Alex
28:17 Charlie & Erika behind the scenes
31:10 Fox vs. Charlie?
34:16 Charlie was “Mr. MAHA”
36:26 Why did TPUSA Team take down cameras?
38:40 Charlie’s true view of politics
39:22 The future for Charlie’s tours & Charlie’s show
42:34 Andrew’s remedy for healing a sick culture

[Maskot]

Demons don’t care and won’t listen, unfortunately. Demons are not Charlie’s focus....it’s the folks who are struggling and know there’s a better way to live. Those folks are coming out of the woodwork

Thank the Lord

[HollyB]

Candace will insinuate he is lying for various reasons. Then she will deny she ever insinuated when proven wrong.
She has caused so much confusion.
1 Corinthian 14:33
For God is not a God of confusion but of peace

[Ann Archy]

This guy said that the CHARLES MANSON LOOK ALIKE GUY that had 2 GUNS and a knife the day before the Celebration of Life of Charlie, Andrew said he was just doing work for a GUEST!!!<P<I DON;T TRUST THIS GUY AT ALL!!!

[roving]

The camera thing bothers me. 5 minutes after Charlie is assassinated, he’s up there grabbing that camera. To make it look even more suspicious, he’s looking around wondering if anybody’s watching him. You don’t mess with the crime scene.

[vivenne]

Andrew or Manson guy?

[vivenne]

Who, Andrew?

[shelterguy]

Who’s on first?

[vivenne]

Babe Ruth.

[piasa]

He didn’t look like Manson, he looked like a cop working urban undercover , or concert security for musicians.

[Ann Archy]

Yeah.....riiiiigggghhhhttt!

[Ann Archy]

Andrew.

[blueplum]

sounds to me like he’s confirming what Megyn, Tucker and Candace said at around cue 9 minutes - that there was outside pressure (”clampdown”) on what Charlie could say or have on his platform, including views on foreign nations, and that there was money from donors that they have refused. After the FBI arrested some kook ( Haim Braverman) who violently threatened Candace and her family back in Sep 2024, I can see why she’s kind of laid low publically this year, but as to Candace in particular, here’s Charlie 3 weeks before he was assassinated: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/u0L6uvt0sSs

As I’ve said before, I don’t know much about Owens, but at this point it seems to me that someone is trying to spin a narrative. Which makes me want to ask, why? Who benefits?

[HollyB]

Candace specifically said via a text that Israel offered 150 billion. Now she’s denying it.

Charlie made it clear that he was grappling with how to deal with the younger generation who are not supporting Israel. Because of this he was getting negative feedback from both sides, that’s what he was dealing with and discussed it clearly on Megan’s show. His views had not changed .

There’s an interview that was released yesterday where his best friend confirms Al of this,

There’s Nothing to read into it.
On Bill Maher interview, he said the left wing maniacs were threats and he had to up his security, he stated it again elsewhere recently ,

[HollyB]

Sorry she said it on Twitter not a text.

[HollyB]

They were securing the camera.

[blueplum]

Candace, Episode 237: **”Lastly, I want to say, to this like new flex Operation Mocking Pastor regarding which, by the way, the first time they went after Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens, a source told me, and I would love to get this confirmed, I’m going to find this out, that $150 million was spent on that and it came from B Netanyahu and Yahoo. I would like to figure out if that’s true.”**

According to factually.co, this $150 million comment regarding operation mockingpastor was then picked up and re-phrased in a instagram msg, by one islamified_ig
09/16/25, the text reading:
“According to multiple reports, Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu offered Charlie Kirk’s TPUSA $150 million in cash to adopt an even more ardently pro-Israel stance.
Kirk refused the money.”
:https://factually.co/fact-checks/politics/turning-point-netanyahu-donation-9555dc

Subsequently, wackadoodle Nick Fuentes repeated this allegation:
“Candace Owens, Max Blumenthal, and some of Nick’s sources claim Israel attempted to bribe Charlie Kirk $150M to support Israel even harder than he already did. Charlie refused.”

as did one “AF. AFPost”, who copied almost word for word, the Islamified_ag post, “According to multiple reports, Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu offered Charlie Kirk’s TPUSA $150 million in cash to adopt an even more ardently pro-Israel stance. Kirk refused the money.”
https://citizenwatchreport.com/unconfirmed-charlie-kirk-allegedly-recently-refused-150-million-from-israel-to-take-more-pro-israel-stances/

it also showed up on Facebook on the account of J.R. Altidor, who stated, “Charlie Kirk turned down $150M from Israel DAYS before he passed away.”
https://www.facebook.com/reel/1292240842401263

Candace’s fan page of Sep 18 also notes Candace’s statement: “Candace then stated that a source told her that the ‘Operation Mocking Pastor’ sermons given by preachers across American churches to discredit her and Tucker Carlson, was a $150 million campaign funded by Netanyahu, though she’s waiting to confirm this.”
https://candaceowensfan.substack.com/p/candace-doubts-the-suspects-messages

Again, I have no horse in this race, and definitely no clue about any Operation Mocking Pastor or if it’s real. I do think if some verbage is being attributed to someone, it’s only right that we look more closely. Whether I’ve changed your perspective or not, I do appreciate our cordial exchange and thank you very much for that. :)

[HollyB]

Candace tweeted it in her X account.
It’s obvious you follow Candace’s every move, at this point, I won’t even watch anyone who references her . I’m not interested in anything she has to say in any way, shape or form. She deserves to get sued. She’s vile.