Posted on 07/17/2025 10:05:13 AM PDT by CDR Kerchner
![]() |
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
I think the claim is:
If the father was a foreign citizen and
If the mother was under 21 and
If the child was born outside the USA
then the child is not a natural born citizen
If the HI birth certificate is fake, and if Obama was actually born in Canada, he really should not have been allowed to serve as president.
Lots of Ifs there, so I guess nothing is certain at this time. But the chain of logic doesn’t seem unreasonable to me.
There was money threatening them just like they threatened the media, as Doug Hagmann has an eyewitness written account of. This was truly a coup with all the levers of power involved, Bondi needs to go there. It can bring down everything. I have names I could give the DOJ so they could open this all up.
(So every child born to a woman under 21 isn’t a citizen?)
Your ignorance of specific citizenship laws at the time of his August birth in 1961 is astounding.
Macho is correct. That was the law back then.
You could deconstruct it with Adobe Illustrator at the time, and see every layer, and how they constructed it. Several of us who worked in the industry kept each other on conference call over it that day, pointing out the obvious faked/edited parts of it. I actually put together a short document with examples describing how they did it. I probably still have it somewhere. Too bad you can't post a file here.
The same question, also applies to the (proven) non-natural-born-citizen status of Kamala Harris.
Reference: @KamalaKancel
Even more astounding, such laws are beside the point when discussing the NBC clause of the Constitution. So much off point that the issue could be correctly resolved by a first-year law student.
When the controversy started Obama was the darling of the media and most of the nation—They didn’t want to hear anything that got in the way of the “Magic negro” who would end racism and lead the nation in Hope and Change. He would make a new America so much that he was given the Nobel Peace Prize for ONE Speech. The Hope and change has changed as the real grifter has come to light.
Kamala Harris was not even a basic Citizen of the United States when she was born in CA, let alone not being an Article II presidential eligibility term constitutional “natural born Citizen”. Adjectives mean something when placed in front of a noun. Harris did not even qualify for meeting the terms of the noun in that term. She was not a basic U.S. “Citizen” when born. Since her parents were sojourning in the USA on student VISAs, and were not domiciled permanent residents of the United States, when Kamala Harris was born. The Wong Kim Ark (1898) U.S. Supreme Court decision only applied to persons born in the USA to legally present permanent resident parents. Considering Kamala Harris to be a Citizen at/by Birth is a classic example of the Birthright Citizenship fraud and abuse that has been promoted by Progressives that Donald Trump’s Executive Order is directed at correcting. The merits of that EO will have to work its way through the federal court system until it reaches SCOTUS, but when it does Trump’s EO will be upheld on the merits based on the prior U.S. Supreme Court case law decisions on what the “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” means in the Constitution’s 14th Amendment regarding “birthright citizenship”. See this Euler Diagram which shows the logical relationship and difference between being a basic “Citizen” of the United States and being a “natural born Citizen” of the United States. Adjectives mean something! https://www.kerchner.com/naturalborncitizen/cfk/Euler-Logic-Diagram-Shows-Logical-Relationship-of-natural-born-Citizen-Set-and-SuperSets.pdf
Adjectives mean something! See this article I wrote to explain that adjectives mean something: “‘Citizen at Birth’ Term vs ‘natural born Citizen’ Term: Grammatical and Logical Analysis”: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2024/08/08/citizen-at-birth-term-vs-natural-born-citizen-term-grammatical-and-logical-analysis/
Quite right.
Arguably, Obama's presidency was the worst scam to hit the nation, only to be surpassed by the unbelievable and patently defective 2020 election.
And yet, people still ask, "How in the world could the voters select Trump?" Then moan, "Our democracy is in peril?"
My supposition has been that the problems with the birth certificate were either related to the legality of his parents’ marriage (which might have been indicated on the original) or to his adoption by his stepfather and subsequent renunciation.of his US citizenship in order to obtain Indonesian citizenship.
That is one for the courts to rule on but they probably won’t because at this point it’s too late.
What makes the Obama situation not too late is that many crimes by Brennan and others to cover up the now-confirmed fact that Obama has no valid Hawaii birth certificate constitutes a criminal conspiracy to commit treason, which has no statute of limitations. This isn’t about Obama but about the criminal coup that foisted him on us and took the entire government hostage - a situation that still exists today.
Unless Kamala Harris runs for office again.
Don’t forget the Hillary line: What difference does it make?
Although Obama’s mother was a U.S. citizen by birth, if Obama wasn’t born in the U.S., his mother was too young to pass on U.S. citizenship to her offspring.
Good point.
I think 19 years old was the requirement. It was established by legislation which has either been repealed or superseded.
Congress has the authority to set citizenship and naturalization laws, which was done regarding when parent citizenship is conferred to babies born outside US soil. Likewise Congress can clarify what “under the jurisdiction thereof” means in the 14th amendment. It obviously means something, or else it wouldn’t have been included. Can somebody illegally sneak into the country and still be subject to the jurisdiction of the very government they violated to get here? If they considered themselves subject to US jurisdiction they would have submitted to the US laws in getting here.
plus he traveled to Pakistan with his boyfriend in 81 under a foreign/Indonesian passport of his adopted father lolo Sotero and Pakistan was not allowing Americans to visit at that time
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.