She's baking a cake..................
Posted on 04/28/2025 4:25:01 AM PDT by Red Badger
Jail somebody.
Jill.........................
the so called “watch dog” media
alternates between
“lap dog” media
and
“attack dog” media
depending on who is in office
Yo Pam…did you hear something?
Hang some bodies.
She's baking a cake..................
HOORAY President Trump and posters!
No.
Potentially, yes — and very serious.
Yes — forgery, conspiracy, false statements.
Not publicly. Only political allegations so far.
No — not until criminal intent and forgery are proven.
A funny thing happened after Joe Biden signed pardons for Hunter, Biden crime
family members and tolerant and compassionate Democrats toiling “for the people.”
Analysts and journos noticed that all Biden’s “signatures”
were identical...... signed not by him but by an “Auto Pen.”
“Whoever was operating the infamous ‘Auto Pen’ should be jailed,”
President Donald Trump posted to Truth Social on Sunday.
Syracuse Univ School of Law
The President’s use of the autopen (or even tasking a human being) to sign a bill outside of the President’s presence is unconstitutional. This establishes a dangerous precedent, one which thinking lawyers in Washington politics seemed to have overlooked. Biden’s autopen episode should not constitute a precedent for future Presidents to follow.
If you would like convictions in addition to arrests, two words...
Patience, grasshopper.
:-)
No — not until criminal intent and forgery are proven.
I don’t think you need criminal intent here. I think, and I believe any jury would agree that it’s clearly implied. In that using the autopen without the knowledge of the ‘elected’ President, is criminal intent and abuse of power.
You only have to prove that someone did it, without approval, and the President not there.
You only have to prove that someone did it, without approval, and the President not there.
Problem one, did Joey even know what he approved? Did not the Speaker say he questioned Bidet’s signing a bill and Joey had no idea he signed it. The witness for the fraud is Joey but Joey cannot be counted on as he is not mentally there.
Is there proof yet?
Roll out the calendar and check where pedo-joe was hiding. If he was hanging at the beach, auto-pen not valid. This is easy to document.
The operators of the auto pen should be easy to identify.
Jill..............
Problem one, did Joey even know what he approved? Did not the Speaker say he questioned Bidet’s signing a bill and Joey had no idea he signed it. The witness for the fraud is Joey but Joey cannot be counted on as he is not mentally there.
Exactly. They knew he had memory problems, so they shouldn’t be signing for him when he isn’t there. They need proof, when they ‘used’ the autopen that they were ‘ordered’ to do so because of his medical status. Like the military, they need evidence it was a ‘direct order’ which means they communicated directly with the POTUS. Sketchy for them to use the ‘Autopen’ so there should be a phone log, and written notes, to that effect. No records, means criminal intent IMHO. I think the jury will see it the same (except in DC or NY State for a Democrat).
Do it.
How?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.