You only have to prove that someone did it, without approval, and the President not there.
Problem one, did Joey even know what he approved? Did not the Speaker say he questioned Bidet’s signing a bill and Joey had no idea he signed it. The witness for the fraud is Joey but Joey cannot be counted on as he is not mentally there.
Problem one, did Joey even know what he approved? Did not the Speaker say he questioned Bidet’s signing a bill and Joey had no idea he signed it. The witness for the fraud is Joey but Joey cannot be counted on as he is not mentally there.
Exactly. They knew he had memory problems, so they shouldn’t be signing for him when he isn’t there. They need proof, when they ‘used’ the autopen that they were ‘ordered’ to do so because of his medical status. Like the military, they need evidence it was a ‘direct order’ which means they communicated directly with the POTUS. Sketchy for them to use the ‘Autopen’ so there should be a phone log, and written notes, to that effect. No records, means criminal intent IMHO. I think the jury will see it the same (except in DC or NY State for a Democrat).