Posted on 11/20/2024 3:05:52 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
A landmark COVID-19 vaccine autopsy study has been republished in Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law. This follows its controversial withdrawal by two prior journals.
The study, led by Nicolas Hulscher, an epidemiologist at the McCullough Foundation. provides what he describes as “robust evidence” linking the vaccines to fatal outcomes. It claims these findings meet the US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) criteria for a “Class I recall.”
A Class I recall is defined by the FDA as necessary when a product poses “a reasonable probability” of causing severe health consequences or death. The study calls for immediate regulatory action.
Hulscher hailed the republication as a “pivotal victory for transparency and accountability in science.” He described it as a blow to the “Academic Publishing Cartel” and their alleged efforts to suppress open debate.
“The forces of censorship and suppression within the biopharmaceutical complex have suffered a significant setback.”
– Nicolas Hulscher, Epidemiologist, McCullough Foundation
The research team includes prominent figures like Dr. Harvey Risch, professor emeritus of epidemiology at Yale, and Dr. Peter McCullough, a noted critic of current vaccine policies. They have emphasized the need for transparency in vaccine safety data.
The study analyzed 44 papers documenting 325 autopsies and one necropsy. After screening out duplicates and incomplete data, researchers found that 73.9% of deaths were directly or significantly linked to COVID-19 vaccination. Most deaths occurred within a week of the last dose, with sudden cardiac death being the leading cause at 35%, followed by pulmonary embolism and myocardial infarction. The findings align with known vaccine injury mechanisms and raise concerns about unexplained...
(Excerpt) Read more at sharylattkisson.com ...
Bookmark
What percentage of the CoVid Vax VAERs reports were fake?
How did you derive the conclusion that they were all fake? What was your data?
My understanding was that it is (or was) extremely difficult to enter data into the VAERs system, taking over half an hour to make the entry - and often having to repeat the process due to lock outs, or other data entry issues. Thus one would have to be very motivated (e.g., very angry, and/or personally affected by an adverse effect) to enter data into VAERs.
The only case I heard of a false entry was due to a pro-Vax doctor who wanted to prove that fake data could be entered - and thus, all the data was suspect.
And finally why did you - or your fellow expert infectious disease and vaccine compatriots - come up with such an easily falsified data collection system that you and your compatriots at the CDC claimed would be use to alert us in case there was a problem with a vaccine/drug release? Only to claim, later, that the data is not usable - leaving us with zero safeguards.
Wow, you assume a lot about what I supposedly know.
Given that my PhD was in biochemistry (the study of proteins) and molecular biology (the study of nucleic acids), I do NOT know that mRNA is "gene therapy." If it were, then you are getting gene therapy every time you eat something (all foods contain mRNA unless they are heavily processed to the point of destroying nucleic acids), every time you get an infection (all pathogens contain mRNA and viruses force your body to make their mRNA), and just from the natural flora (consisting of all types of microorganism) that inhabits your body.
What I DO know, because this is what I studied in university, is that mRNA lives only in the cytosol. It doesn't go into the nucleus where the DNA is. When pre-mRNA is made in the nucleus, it is transported out to the cytosol and cannot reenter the nucleus. In order for something to be a "gene therapy" agent, it must be able to access the nucleus and physically change the DNA. That's another thing: mRNA has no enzymatic activity and cannot alter the DNA. So, no, mRNA from ANY source is not a gene therapy.
As for avian flu (I assume you mean H5N1 and not one of the other avian flus like H7N9 or H9N2), I have been monitoring it for over a decade now. Influenza viruses efficiently infect -EITHER- birds -OR- mammals but cannot efficiently infect both at the same time. (There are exceptions, such as pigs which are equally susceptible to bird and mammal influenza viruses.) The H5N1 virus has a hard time infecting humans, but when it does, it causes a very serious disease because the virus settles deep in the lungs. This kind of infection has a fatality rate of about 60% in humans. But it does not spread person-to-person.
The H5N1 that is causing concern seems to be able to infect mammals more easily than previous clades of H5N1. It may even be capable of limited human-to-human transmission. When an influenza virus adapts to infect mammals, it infects the upper respiratory tract--the throat and sinuses--not the deep lungs. Typically, an infection that is confined to the upper respiratory tract is not as serious as one that infects deep in the lungs. The most common influenzas have a fatality rate of about 0.1%--600 times lower than H5N1.
The reason public health figures are watching this H5N1 virus is that they do not know what will happen if it becomes fully adapted to humans and able to spread efficiently human-to-human. Yes, H5N1 is very deadly now--but if it adapts to humans, it might not be very deadly. We don't know, and there is not an influenza expert in the world who can predict what will happen.
The good thing about another influenza pandemic (if it turns into that) is that we've had influenza vaccine technology for a hundred years now and we're very good at producing new influenza vaccines quickly.
but you are open to a debate
As for fake reports, they go something like this:
Report #2512406-1 COVID19 VACCINE (COVID19) Life Threatening Yes No Death "I was pressured to get vaccinated under identity listed under patient information after I reported that that?s NOT my identity. The shelter was aware the entire time that I do not hold any status under that ID therefore it?s attempting murder to insist I get vaccinated under someone else?s identification. On 4/24/21 and 4/29/21 immigration Officer confirmed my urgent notification to the shelter regarding my id that I do not hold ANY STATUS in this country at least I?m NOT respectively registered under id ""private"" DOB: Unknown and that?s considered at least immigration fraud. The shelter also had NO justification to hold as a client (Hostage) under ID that?s not even registered in Internal system. I?m NOT safe living here, being force to take drugs under a fake identification. I haven?t felt well or the same since taken the vaccine and since I?m unable to get assistance from police I reported my medical conditions to another authority on 9/28/22 and I still haven?t her back from any agency is against the law."
Wow, that's pretty good English for someone posing as an illegal alien in a shelter--which is how I know this is a fake entry, along with the fact that the narrative itself looks to have been written with an agenda.
Report #2236146-1 COVID19 VACCINE (COVID19) Death Yes Mar., 2022 Pericarditis, hospitalized multiple times,
Given the utter lack of any details, this looks like a fake report. A real report contains details, such as medical findings during hospitalization, treatments administered, etc.
And so on. You are free to search VAERS for yourself at VAERS. Since adverse events regardless of cause are required by law to be reported to VAERS if they occur within (I think) a month of vaccination, there are a lot of events that have nothing to do with vaccine. Like the woman who had a bad reaction to an attempt to harvest oocytes for IVF (0972399-1).
Legitimate reports increase, too, when there is a lot of publicity surrounding a vaccine. This is not a reflection on the vaccine, but a result of the publicity. Most people don't feel a need to report to VAERS when they feel under the weather after receiving a vaccine.
The last vaccine (or shot) I took was a tetanus injection. I was nauseous, and threw up, an hour later. An "adverse reaction" but one on the 'meh' scale, and certainly not worth reporting. Just my body saying 'I don't like this', but hopefully the shot did what it was supposed to do.
It is unfortunate that we don't have an accurate/trustworthy reporting system for real/serious post-vaccination issues.
I immediately became suspicious of the vax when we saw the monumental suppression of contrary information regarding its safety. What really sealed the deal is when Bill Gates was encouraging everyone to take the shot.
Why does the appointment of RFK junior to head HHS have Big Pharma peeing their pants if they don’t have anything to hide?
He needs to come clean on it.
“Have you ever delved into VAERS data for yourself?”
Yes. And I’ve seen the results on patients.
I’ve also researched many results of current studies done.
Most of what I’ve seen is the result of viral spike protein damage to the human body.
Covid jab is dangerous and I do not recommend them.
And I am not what you would call an “antivaxxer.”
Glad, very glad, I chose the body’s immunity over an unproven, fatality producing, experimental vaccine!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.
Likewise. And twice after I received Ivermectin and HCL medications ordered from India, I was tested for COVID due to flu-like symptoms. Negative results both times. Trust your body’s natural immunity, pay attention to your habits (the good and questionable ones). And consider using multi-vitamins, zinc, Quercetin, CoQ10, etc. if you feel the need.
One of the guys I work with had some kin who wanted to take a cruise for a high school graduation present. Of course, you couldn’t take a cruise without getting the $$hot. Less than 48 hrs. later parents found their kid dead in bed.
Pure coincidence I’m sure.
Funny thing about the tetanus shot. We were sitting around the dinner table at the fire station and the topic of tetanus came up. There was well over 100 years combined paramedic experience (including rural private service) and no one had ever run or heard mention of a case of tetanus. So I started asking around (medical professionals) and finally found one old nurse who said she had a patient one time many years ago.
The general belief is that if you get a scratch from a rusty nail and don’t have a tetanus shot, you are going to die. Fact is that unless that nail is buried in mud that had cattle on it, your risk is statistically zero.
How dud the researchers separate the effects of a COVID infection and the vaccine side effects?
Sod Off, Troll.
TheThirdRuffian :”The dam appears broken.
Time to start putting people in prison.”
jimbug : “Fauci should be tried for crimes against humanity. “
(according to the article ) :
"..The study, led by Nicolas Hulscher, an epidemiologist at the McCullough Foundation. provides
what he describes as “robust evidence” linking the vaccines to fatal outcomes. (Emphasis Mine )
It claims these findings meet the US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) criteria for a “Class I recall.”
"A Class I recall is defined by the FDA as necessary when a product poses “a reasonable probability” of causing severe health consequences or death.
The study calls for immediate regulatory action."
"Hulscher hailed the republication as a “pivotal victory for transparency and accountability in science.”
He described it as a blow to the “Academic Publishing Cartel” and their alleged efforts to suppress open debate."
“The forces of censorship and suppression within the biopharmaceutical complex have suffered a significant setback.
– Nicolas Hulscher, Epidemiologist, McCullough Foundation"
"The research team includes prominent figures like Dr. Harvey Risch, professor emeritus of epidemiology at Yale,
and Dr. Peter McCullough, a noted critic of current vaccine policies.
They have emphasized the need for transparency in vaccine safety data."
"The study analyzed 44 papers documenting 325 autopsies and one necropsy.
After screening out duplicates and incomplete data,
researchers found that 73.9% of deaths were directly or significantly linked to COVID-19 vaccination.(Emphasis Mine)
Most deaths occurred within a week of the last dose, with sudden cardiac death being the leading cause at 35%,
followed by pulmonary embolism and myocardial infarction.
The findings align with known vaccine injury mechanisms and raise concerns about unexplained..."
(My Opinion) : Yes, the dam of censorship is finally broken - well said FReeper ' TheThirdRuffian '.
And it is long overdue...
And yes, FReeper 'jimbug', let's begin the trials for violation of the Nuremberg Code for denying full transparency and "informed consent" for the injection.
Troll, indeed.
That one just can’t help itself.
Maybe we should ping RFKJr to that one 🤔
Am I suppose to assume that my having to spend the night in the hospital and two weeks under a cardiologist’s care would have just happened anyway without the jab?
EC
Because we don’t have an accurate/trustworthy reporting system for real/serious post-vaccination issues I don’t trust any shots.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.