Posted on 10/18/2024 4:15:52 AM PDT by EBH
Transcript of a very important FACT CHECK. I have not seen this DoD change come up here on FR yet, although several other sites have been talking about it. While her answer here we all know is 'projection' there is a dangerous reality afoot.
52:21 It gets more. He's the one who talks about an enemy with in with in an enemy with in talking about the American people. Notice that the pitch of her voice is changing. It is is is higher. The enemy with in with it. That is a bit of nervousness. And she is just losing it. She's trying to, well, let's say regain composure. And this is when she makes one of the worst mistakes in this interview. Suggesting he would turn the American military on the American people.
52:56 So I want to say something about this. And this was thank you to thanks to military arms on X. This is a perfect example of the lies. Harris tells this is a flat out lie. And I'm going to show you. This is a very strong fact check and a very dangerous fact check. And if you're a citizen of the United States, you better pay attention to this part of this analysis. She is accusing Trump of wanting to turn the US military against the American people. He has made no such effort. However, this week, Harris administration did just that.
53:31 Her Department of Defense authorized the military to shoot Americans. And we need to look at this. I'm going to read this because this is critical. It looks boring, but it's really important. This for whatever is going to happen on November 5th and the days after the election. Defense intelligence. This is the relevant provisions updated
53:54 on the Department of Defense directive 5240.01. Defense intelligence components may provide personnel to assist a federal department or agency, including a federal law enforcement agency or a state or local law enforcement agency when lives are in danger in response to a request for such assistance in accordance with the following approval authorities. But the delicate part is this.
Assistance in responding with assets with potential for lethality. 54:32 Or any situation in which it is reasonably foreseeable that providing the requested assistance may involve the use of force that is likely to result in lethal force, including death or serious bodily injury.
This is serious. This is serious, my friends. It also includes, and this is why I am so worried about this, it also includes all support to civilian law enforcement officials in situations where a confrontation confrontation between civilian law enforcement and civilian individuals or groups is reasonably anticipated.
55:19 The writing is on the wall. I will not say anything else about this topic, but we are talking about lethality. Likely to result in lethal force and 2 confrontations between civilian law enforcement and civilian individuals or groups. You tell me that it cannot get more clear than that. And Kamala Harris is accusing Donald Trump of something that just happened under her administration. God knows why, what for.
55:51 I really don't want to get into that topic, but it's something that has to be addressed. It has nothing to do with bottle language, but I needed to make that fact check so you are aware of what could be coming. We asked that question to the former president today.
The DoD Quietly Reissues DoD Directive 5240.01, Expanding the Use of Lethal Force Against U.S. Citizens in Potentially Deadly Domestic Situations
DoD Directive 5240.01: NO LONGER A NEED TO DECLARE “Martial Law”
https://therebelpatient.substack.com/p/the-dod-quietly-reissues-dod-directive
She’s a lot like Boobamba. A godawful combination of arrogance and ignorance.
Fox’s Baier set her up but good on the “Biden dementia” question......Brett handled it beautifully.
She knows dam well she participated in a cover-up for one express purpose.......
.....to flim-flam the very electorate she’s trying to win over.......
You all think so now?
...and yet NO ADS demonstrating this point...ZERO! The news will not carry this info. Not gonna happen.
My read on this directive is that when local authorities/police are in a situation when citizens, individually or corporately, are putting other people (govt or citizens) in danger that can cause death, that local authority can request the federal government to provide policing support who will then have the authority to use legal force when they see that lives are in danger.
Am I missing something? How is the directive different from a governor or the president callling in National Guard to use lethal force to stop civil unrest where lives are being put in danger?
This is all voters need to know: “Biden-Harris Dept of Defense directive 5240.01.”
<><>DOD intel may provide tax-paid personnel to assist a tax-subsided federal dept or agency,
<><>including a federal l/e agency or a state or local l/e enforcement agency
<><>a request for such assistance with tax-paid assets might specify a potential for lethality
<><>the requested assistance may materially involve the use of force
<><>including lethal force likely to inflict death or serious bodily injury to American taxpaying citizens.
So Kamala is worried about Trump turning the military loose on the American people and they’ve facilitated that very thing during a race for power that is not looking good for them? I’d say they fully expect to be in power no matter what. And technically they will be in power for 75 some odd days after the election…
My question is, without knowing more details: Where does the DoD have the authority to make this change? Mao's statement of from where power emanates comes to mind, and its something the Founding Fathers were very concerned about.
It is different because before the professional national military was not authorized to use lethal force.
The National Guard, which was typically state localized and maybe augmented by other sate forces is not the professional military, i.e. Army, Navy, marines etc..
Many just blur them all together and yes the National Guard can be activated onto the professional military.
This is a big deal as it allows the full assets of the real US death machine to unload on US citizens!
Yep - they are looking for another Jan 6 AGAINST REPUBLICANS ONLY.
This will NEVER be used against BLM or antifa.
“Am I missing something? How is the directive different from a governor or the president callling in National Guard to use lethal force to stop civil unrest where lives are being put in danger? “
You’re missing the forest for the trees. Your very question above indicates that this isn’t needed…yet here it is. So what is it?
Oh, it has everything to do with the bottle.
This week, hate-filled Democrat candidate Harris made no
bones about turning the US military against American citizens.
In typical Democrat fashion, Harris accused Trump of this atrocity.
He has made no such statement.
She craves dictatorship powers over Americans.......she will control us.....or else.
"I was VP and Biden was POTUS, but the problems of the country over the past 4 years are because of Trump, who was a private citizen during that time, and who was running."
"You know what I'm talking about."
"Uh...No, I don't.
LOL. What an idiot she is.
Yes you are...
She was edgy because she needed a drink. After the Obama flub, even the media knows they have to let Obama drift away. The media can’t help Obama anymore.Trump will bring back Judeo Christian values and Obama will be a blip in the history books. The country is looking more United and hopeful every minute.
The left has always accused the right of that which they are doing
This is my thinking. They are not going to let Trump take office, even if he wins in a landslide like Reagan.
Sadly I do not think Americans understand the concept that we just might have to physically…well…
God needs America preoccupied
Yes, your screen name has been saying it all, for many years.
And you have been right all along.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.