WashPost Attempts to Justify Conservative Censorship by Big Tech After Dismissing Its Existence

NewsBusters ^ | 10/10/2024 | Joseph Vazquez

[JV3MRC]

The Washington Post followed a familiar scheme when it comes to the incessant media gaslighting on the existence of censorship of conservatives: First, deny it exists. Second, admit it exists, but excuse it away by asserting that such censorship is justifiable.

The Post released an eye-popping Oct. 3 story that reeked of absurdity. “Why conservatives get suspended more than liberals on social media,” read the irony-laced headline based on a new so-called study published by Nature. The leftist rag attempted to play gotcha with Sen. J.D. Vance’s (R-OH) comments during the vice presidential debate, when he suggested that censorship was the “much bigger threat to democracy.” In the process, The Post committed peak, double-talking hypocrisy of the first degree by admitting that censorship of “conservatives” was real after spending column inches in years past pretending that it didn’t.

[libertylover]

Tagline explains it.

[TornadoAlley3]

https://x.com/liz_churchill10/status/1844225925598281963

Kamala says DOJ coming for social media platforms. She gone shut you down.