Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 09/29/2024 4:53:40 PM PDT by Freeleesy
But the brutal fact is that civilian deaths are Hezbollah’s strongest weapon. As Sheik Hassan Nasrallah, the leader of Hezbollah, once said: “We have discovered how to hit the Jews where they are the most vulnerable. The Jews love life, so that is what we shall take away from them. We are going to win because they love life and we love death.” [...] First of all, Israel is responding not just to those recent killings but to a long string of attacks since it withdrew from Lebanon in 2000. The kidnapping was just the straw that broke the camel’s back.
Second, as the Israeli government rightly points out, no country operates on the principle of responding to aggression with no more force than was originally used against it. During World War II, Germany sunk a lot of American ships and declared war on us, and in return we flattened its cities, killed or captured hundreds of thousands of its solders and occupied its land. That was hardly a proportionate response...
Thus Hezbollah places its rockets and other potential targets in homes, knowing that Israel cannot hit back without creating collateral damage. This does not relieve Israel of the burden of minimizing civilian casualties as best it can. The point is that if Israel has to operate under a code of ethics that renders civilian deaths unacceptable, then it automatically loses. The ramifications would be dire and ultimately aid the cause of Islamic radicals in such a way as to bring about many more innocent deaths over the long run.
The real question, then, is not whether Israel’s counteroffensive is disproportionate but whether it’s working.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
He was a Democratic too? Huh. A Democratic head chopper. Who knew?
The proportion of concern is: harm to the innocent/harm to the harmful.
Sleep with dogs, get fleas.
Hang with terrorists, get put in pine box.
Interesting.
So applicable still today almost 20 years later.
” they love life and we love death.”
Why killing them should be consequence free.
Who says that?
The ones not on your side.
islam is a totalitarian death cult founded by a child rapist:
“The Jews love life, so that is what we shall take away from them. We are going to win because they love life and we love death.”
And how did that work out?
“The real question, then, is not whether Israel’s counteroffensive is disproportionate but whether it’s working.”
The other side can easily stop the killing of its civilians by surrendering.
The only thing that matters in a war is winning. If you win you are right, by default.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.