Posted on 09/21/2024 7:57:41 AM PDT by sopo
The result was a legal challenge by the DNC and an eventual consent decree against the RNC forbidding them from challenging any election result. Those limitations against the republican party lasted from 1982 until 2017.
Again, in 2016 a generally unapproved candidate, Donald Trump, wins the election. The response, yet another legal challenge by activist democrats seeking yet another consent decree against the RNC and Trump campaign. If successful, any challenge to the 2024 election would have to be approved by left-wing federal courts in Washington DC.
Seeding the proactive narrative, the New York Times recently said the results from the 2024 election could be delayed for days or weeks. “For the second straight presidential election, it is becoming increasingly likely that there will be no clear and immediate winner on election night and that early returns could give a false impression of who will ultimately prevail.” [link] If that sounds like a predictive position to assist fraud, it is.
This brings me to a point that many do not quite understand. When you consider the potential for yet another consent decree limiting election challenges and contests, there is a benefit to various election integrity efforts NOT being connected directly to the RNC or Trump campaign.
Regardless of what happens in DC courts, all independent groups and election security efforts would not be covered by a consent decree against the Trump campaign and/or RNC. There is a purpose and benefit to being independent and focused on precinct level integrity issues.... t.
We are hearing about a lot of ballot challenge success in advance of the 2024 election as various grassroots organizations work diligently through a process of reviewing voter rolls and challenging discoveries based on duplicate registrations, expired registrations and more significantly, fraudulent addresses.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
So they AGAIN may just steal the election even with the most idiotic candidate ever.
Yes. If they don’t outright cancel the election.
So they AGAIN may just steal the election even with the most idiotic candidate ever.
They got away with it in 2020. Why wouldn’t they do it again?
Having a consent decree disallowing the challenging of an election for one party seems unconstitutional and I’m wondering wht this wasn’t taken to the USSC?
The Democrats realized after 2017 that they had their judges in place in the areas where they were cheating, and didn't need the consent decree any more.
Many of the Republicans are Assistant Democrats.
2017 : for the first full term when this consent decree was not in effect they arrange everything from a epidemic to a summer of love to J6 ...
There is definitely a pattern there
I don’t recall the liberal/ conservative breakdown in 1980.
Rehnquist became chief judge in 1986, then we had era of Souters, Kennedys etc. I remember discussions of the consent decree here for many years, I know the judge who signed the original order retired but somehow came in to renew it on a annual basis; but it always seemed to be “something we just don’t talk about” on a national level.
Seeding the proactive narrative, the New York Times recently said the results from the 2024 election could be delayed for days or weeks.
One for Trump one for Harris
Two for Trump one two for Harris
Three for Trump one two three for Harris.....................
"The result was a legal challenge by the DNC and an eventual consent decree against the RNC forbidding them from challenging any election result [??? emphasis added]."
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument
After alleged ballot box fraud in 2020, it was noted that desperate elite Democrats had challenged electoral vote results for the last three Republicans who had won the Oval Office.
Democrats Have Objected to Electoral Vote Certification For the Last 3 GOP Presidents (1.1.21)
What's even worse is that, despite the zero tolerance "hair trigger" wording of Section 2 of the 14th Amendment (14A), that section a penalty for states where ballot box fraud has occurred, Pence and J6 Congress wrongly ignored (imo) that section despite allegations of vote-counting problems.
In fact, desperate elite Democrats have again allegedly violated Section 2 in 2024 by throwing out 14+ million primary votes for Obiden, unilaterally substituting OHarris as Democratic presidential candidate.
Excerpted from 14A:
"But when the right to vote at any election"
"is denied to any"
"or in any way abridged,"
"Section 2: Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election [all emphases added] for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State." [Apportionment of Representatives]
"Section 5: The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article."
Consider that the post-Civil War congressional Republicans who drafted Section 2 made it to discourage Southern Democrats (my words) from rigging the ballot boxes that Democrats are now alleged to have done for 2020, 2022, the 2024 primaries and possibly earlier elections!
"Because slavery (except as punishment for crime) had been abolished by the Thirteenth Amendment, the freed slaves would henceforth be given full weight for purposes of apportionment. This situation was a concern to the Republican leadership of Congress, who worried that it would increase the political power of the former slave states, even as such states continued to deny freed slaves the right to vote." —Apportionment of Representatives
Since the feds and renegade states have repeatedly proven that they are enemies of the people imo, it is now up to Democratic and Republican Trump supporters to effectively "impeach and remove" ALL (exceptions?) state and federal lawmakers and executives in November.
In fact, it's up to us Trump supporters to take the first MAJOR step in draining the swamp by supporting hopeful Trump 47 with a new, Constitution-respecting Congress, new state lawmakers too, not only so that he will not be a lame duck president from the first day of his second term, but will support him to quickly finish draining the swamp.
Finally, let's not allow the anti-Trump media try to fade our memories of what we witnessed on July 13.
Down the Memory Hole: Google Hides Autocomplete Suggestions Related to Trump Assassination Attempt (7.28.24)
Dickinson R. Debevoise [Hero of the Democrat Communist Party] came in till he tipped over at 91 in 2015.
You'll never guess who studied at his knee when she first started as a law clerk in 1983.
Beryl Howell, tyrant of the US District Court for the District of Columbia.
Beryl Howell was in on the ground floor of industrial-grade election rigging in this country.
I can imagine them snickering about it in Debevoise's chambers.
If they do we don’t have to take it as a personal failure - it just means there are no such things as “elections” and the power structure installs whoever it wants. Patriots can focus on being ungovernable rather than spending time and money on rigged games.
1982 Consent Decree articles:
The Republican National Committee Consent Decree of 1982 (Opinion)
End of 1982 Consent Decree: GOP can finally contest vote fraud after 36 years
How does one become’’ungovernable’, and wouldn’t they just start mass shooting those who are?
poison fruit from a poison tree
Jay Valentine on Omega4 America substack had said his operation was goiung live during this past week, but no follow up to date, though ballots have started going out and early voting in some states. I’m disappointed.
"End of 1982 Consent Decree: GOP can finally contest vote fraud after 36 years"
The 1982 Consent Decree is evidence (imo) that desperate elite Democrats have allegedly been rigging elections at least since 1982, RINOs an accomplice if such is the case.
The 1982 Consent Degree is based on the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (President Johnson), which is reasonably based on the 15th Amendment which protects only citizen voters on the basis of race.
"15th Amendment, Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote [emphasis added] shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation."
Voting Rights Act of 1965, Section 2 is a general provision that prohibits state and local government from imposing any voting rule that "results in the denial or abridgement of the right of any citizen to vote [emphasis added] on account of race or color" or membership in a language minority group.
The MAJOR constitutional problem with the 1982 Consent Degree, at least the way it is evidently being interpreted to allow non-citizens to vote, is this imo. The congressional record shows that the post-Civil War lawmakers were concerned that renegade states who allowed illegal aliens to vote would be wrongly nullifying the Constitution's "Uniform Rule of Naturalization Clause," which elite, desperate Democrats are now wrongly trying to do imo.
"Article I, Section 8, Clause 4: To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization [emphasis added], and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;"
" If the States can admit to the elective franchise those who are not citizens, thereby neutralizing the votes of citizens, not only the Federal power of naturalization becomes a nullity, but" * * * * "a minority of citizens by the aid of aliens may control the government of the States, and through the States the government of the Union [emphasis added]." —Appendix to the Congressional Globe, 1868. (See near middle of 1st column.)
" Whatever difference there may be as to what other rights appertain to a citizen, all must agree that he has the right to petition and also to claim the Protection of the Government. These belong to him as a member the body politic, and the possession of them is what separates citizens of the lowest condition from aliens and slaves. To suppose that a State can make an alien a citizen or confer on him the right of voting would involve the absurdity of giving him the direct and immediate control of the action of the General Government, from which he can claim no protection and to which he has no right to present a petition [emphasis added]." —Appendix to the Congressional Globe, 1868. (See bottom half of 1st column.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.