Skip to comments.
California’s Gavin Newsom Just Signed a Bill That Bans Deep Fake Videos – After This Kamala Harris Parody Video Went Viral
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com ^
| 9/18/2024
| ben kew
Posted on 09/18/2024 7:49:21 AM PDT by bitt
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
1
posted on
09/18/2024 7:49:21 AM PDT
by
bitt
To: null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; bitt; ...
2
posted on
09/18/2024 7:49:38 AM PDT
by
bitt
(<img src=' 'width=30%>)
To: bitt
3
posted on
09/18/2024 7:51:36 AM PDT
by
bitt
(<img src=' 'width=30%>)
To: bitt
Sorry Reichsfuhrer Newsom - still have 1st Amendement in USA.
4
posted on
09/18/2024 7:52:21 AM PDT
by
HombreSecreto
(The life of a repo man is always intense)
To: bitt
They wanted AI but now they Hate AI ,LOL
To: bitt
Will be overturned by the courts eventually when it is used to take down obvious parody and other free speech usage.
6
posted on
09/18/2024 7:53:21 AM PDT
by
Skwor
To: bitt
You can no longer knowingly distribute an ad or other election communications that contain materially deceptive contentWell, so much for Harris/Walz campaign ads, in California anyway. Democrat ads in general, for that matter.
To: bitt
“I could care less if it was Harris or Trump,”
Lying sack of s**t.
He AND his party - and ESPECIALLY Harris’ campaign - will gleefully do it with abandon, knowing they will be immune.
8
posted on
09/18/2024 7:54:55 AM PDT
by
Regulator
(It's fraud, Jim)
To: bitt
Nobody would think that’s real.
That person sounds noticeably coherent than the actual Harris.
9
posted on
09/18/2024 7:56:30 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
To: bitt
Hey! Great idea! Now ban all pornography on the internet!
Oh ... is that impossible? Would any attempt just be empty show-boating? Huh. I guess it’s like that sometimes.
10
posted on
09/18/2024 7:56:40 AM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(My decisions about people are based almost entirely on skin color. I learned this from Democrats.)
To: bitt
11
posted on
09/18/2024 7:57:23 AM PDT
by
Magnum44
(...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )
To: bitt
“Exploring the significance of the insignificant is itself significant.”
12
posted on
09/18/2024 7:58:30 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
To: bitt
I’m so glad I escaped California.
13
posted on
09/18/2024 7:59:32 AM PDT
by
P-Marlowe
(Do the math. L+G+B+T+Q = 666)
To: bitt
Great ad! And that is what it is - a campaign ad. Can Newest do this? I don’t think so!
14
posted on
09/18/2024 8:00:01 AM PDT
by
Rummyfan
( In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man.)
To: bitt
You can no longer knowingly distribute an ad or other election communications that contain materially deceptive content — including deepfakes. This isn't actually about "deep fakes."
The term "deceptive" could be construed as including the "omission of pertinent information."
So a statement like "inflation skyrocketed during the Biden/Harris administration" could be vilified as "deceptive" because the speaker failed to mention that part of the rising prices were due, e.g., to Covid, or that the Biden/Harris administration "undertook heroic efforts" to curb inflation.
Regards,
15
posted on
09/18/2024 8:04:26 AM PDT
by
alexander_busek
(Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
To: bitt
Holy First Amendment, Batman!
To: alexander_busek
Would Global Warming Climate Crisis be included but coming out the a Leftist Mouth ?
To: bitt
“I could care less if it was Harris or Trump,” Really, Gavin? How much less? A lot less or a little less? (Or are you just another parrot who mindlessly repeats stupid phrases as does 70% of the rest of the sheep in our country?)
18
posted on
09/18/2024 8:07:37 AM PDT
by
LittleBillyInfidel
(This tagline has been formatted to fit the screen. Some content has been edited.)
To: bitt
Too late, Gavin. Sent it to everyone I know or have an email link or message link to.
Besides, you don’t really want it to stop because you want her to lose. Otherwise, you’d have to wait 8 more years for your shot at the Oval Office. By signing the bill and talking about it to the press, you’ve ensured it will get out there even more.
19
posted on
09/18/2024 8:09:33 AM PDT
by
Gaffer
To: bitt
How about Adam Schiff altering Senate testimony..
20
posted on
09/18/2024 8:10:11 AM PDT
by
Track9
(If you want to know about human nature, read a power tool user manual. )
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson