Posted on 09/15/2024 12:57:09 PM PDT by DFG
Senator Roger Marshall (R-KS) suggested on Friday that a Senate Investigation into ABC News and Kamala Harris’ campaign for suspected collusion in last Tuesday’s rigged presidential debate has begun.
It is suspected that Kamala knew the questions in advance due to her out-of-the-ordinary, well-prepared responses.
As The Gateway Pundit reported, ABC denied that Kamala Harris was given the debate questions in advance amid calls for an internal investigation into the network for debate rigging.
This denial from ABC came after Former Clinton advisor Mark Penn called for a third party to perform an internal investigation into ABC News. "I think a review of all their internal texts and emails really should be done by an independent party to find out to what extent they were planning on, in effect, you know, fact-checking just one candidate and in effect, rigging the outcome of this debate," said Penn on the John Solomon Reports podcast.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
It will go nowhere.
Outstanding!!! Fight!!!
Mighty suspicious ‘earrings” Kamala wore. Almost like wireless earbud earrings.
No crime was committed. Debates are not “national security” stuff.
Senators don’t “formally investigate” anything - especially Senators in the minority.
Oh good grief.
How about expending as much effort of election rigging?
You can stay on the sideline. The rest of us will carry the battle forward...
It will go nowhere, but the charges of election interference should not go unanswered. Especially when true. It is not Russia, Russia, Russia. It is ABC, DNC, NBC.
“It will go nowhere.”
___________
You’re always cynical on things like this, I’ve witnessed it myself many times. I usually hold out some hope. So far though, I have to give you credit, you’ve been right. A sad state of affairs.
It’s the media to go after, not Harris.
It’s hysterical reading the whiners and Debbie downers in this thread. Isn’t this the exact sort of lawfare the rats have participated in the past 8 years while the GOP sits on the sidelines and everyone here complains?
She did not even hesitate. It was almost like she had the lines memorized.
It will go nowhere.
This guy is less Swamp than many, having been in DC only since 2017. But that does break the 6 year rule and he can’t be trusted.
Is this connected to the whistleblower?
Let me guess, there will be a letter on formal, engraved letterhead stationery.
Now that betting markets on politics is legal the bettors who got screwed by the cheat have grounds to sue. There is also the possibility of being prosecuted for rigging a market, kinda like rigging an NFL game.
Oh goody...another investigation.
“No crime was committed. Debates are not “national security” stuff.”
No crime is needed to remove an FCC license if it can be demonstrated that ABC is not working in the interest of the public good.
Rigging a debate with the intent of altering an election outcome would fall into that category.
All that’s required is validation of the alleged whistleblower’s affidavit. Thereafter, it can be used as campaign material.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.