Posted on 09/15/2024 12:37:03 PM PDT by Red Badger
Documents are being reported by prominent đť•Ź users as being the rumored ABC News whistleblower affidavit. If they are real and if the information in them is accurate, then this is a legitimate bombshell that will be widely ignored by all of corporate media.
The skeptic in me wants to wait to hear from “official” sources, including Speaker of the House Mike Johnson who is allegedly in contact with the whistleblower. But everything about the document seems to jibe with not only what has been rumored but also what we saw during the ABC News presidential debate last week.
Here are the first six pages of the document (TL:DR highlights below):
Here are some of the key points according to the whistleblower’s affidavit:
* ABC News was coordinating with Kamala Harris’ campaign far more than with Donald Trump’s campaign.
* They agreed to not ask questions on certain subjects that would have been detrimental to Harris. The same considerations were not offered to Trump, nor did his campaign ask for them.
* “Sample” questions were provided to the Harris campaign and not to Trump’s.
* Fact-checks on Donald Trump were required by the Harris campaign.
* Harris was not to face comparable fact-checks.
* Split-screen views were required to favor Harris.
* It is noteworthy that the affidavit was signed, notarized, and mailed out BEFORE the debate.
The fact that everything the whistleblower detailed appears to have happened makes this exceedingly damning.
Can this turn into something big? Can this be used against the Harris campaign, ABC News, or both? It’s hard to tell. In a sane world this would be the bombshell that annihilates ABC News’ credibility and shreds the prospects for Team Kamala. Since we don’t live in a sane world there’s no telling whether this will be memory-holed, debunked, subjected to massive gaslighting, or a combination thereof.
We’ll see. All we know for sure is that if this is real and accurate, it needs to be shared far and wide.
Great touch that the whistleblower mailed the affidavit to himself before the debate and that it would remain unopened as proof he had the knowledge before the debate. Mailed it to Speaker Johnson by registered mail BEFORE the debate also so no one could accuse him of speculating after the debate. Also indicates has recordings made secretly in the workplace documenting what he said occurred.
“This has been MSM-moderated Debate S.O.P. for years.”
Ah, ok. So, you see this as normal these day and nothing to see here.
Why the different font sizes?
Should be possible to narrow down the signing NY notary public
ABC-TV, The Walt Disney Company
47 West 66th Street
New York, NY 10023
Customer service
1 (800) 230-0229
Wow. Interesting. So many questions. Who did the redactions, and for what purpose? They surely did a poor job. The first two characters of the affiant’s first name are visible. Won’t take ABC long to figure out where the leak is! If this is real, I’m sure they know already. I hope the affiant has prepared for that.
It would seem like this person (I think it’s a woman), has been with ABC for a very long time, as they make reference to ABC before becoming part of Disney in 1996. A secretary of some kind? Personal assistant of one of the producers?
This person states ‘sample questions’ were sent, but does not reveal how they know this, or if they can prove it. They do say they have recorded conversations proving Harris insisted on Trump fact-checks, and what questions were not to be asked of Harris. How could this person have recorded these conversations? Were they in the room while ABC producers were speaking with Harris? Wouldn’t this mean they only have the ABC person recorded? Or would they have had these conversations on speakerphone around a conference room table?
The fact that this affidavit was signed the day before the debate and all the allegations happened as predicted make me think this could be real. The House needs to be all over this. Get this person, if they’re real, and if they don’t disappear under oath ASAP.
Did we ever get the tapes of the Hur interview of Biden than Garland was held in contempt over? So much for Anna Paulina Luna’s threat of having him arrested by the sergeant of arms. Funny how that story got shoved down the memory hole.
As usual, Trump left to carry the ball.
Bookmark
This will be the most underreported event of 2024.
I also hear that Brennan et al are putting together an affidavit that says this has all the earmarks of Russian disinformation, just to give the old media something to say if the subject does come up.
“Some weird places for those redactions. Wonder what they were hiding.”
Probably information that could be used to id the whistleblower. Right now, it is full time purge time at ABC.
With how many bullet holes?
Thanks, glad to hear he was no an “Arkancide”
We are going to have to build a really big warehouse to store all these bombshells that keep piling up. Where should we build it?
Capitol Hill......................
“People get their news from media.”
Well, not exactly any more. I have not watched TV at all for over 10 years. Have not subscribed to a newspaper for over 20 years.
Over time I found credible on line sources that are more timely and accurate than any network.
The mass of humanity does.
Media including social media…
Social media is also soiled to point of uselessness.
But X, Truth Social, and a couple of others are sane. And worth reading.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.