Posted on 09/15/2024 12:37:03 PM PDT by Red Badger
Documents are being reported by prominent đť•Ź users as being the rumored ABC News whistleblower affidavit. If they are real and if the information in them is accurate, then this is a legitimate bombshell that will be widely ignored by all of corporate media.
The skeptic in me wants to wait to hear from “official” sources, including Speaker of the House Mike Johnson who is allegedly in contact with the whistleblower. But everything about the document seems to jibe with not only what has been rumored but also what we saw during the ABC News presidential debate last week.
Here are the first six pages of the document (TL:DR highlights below):
Here are some of the key points according to the whistleblower’s affidavit:
* ABC News was coordinating with Kamala Harris’ campaign far more than with Donald Trump’s campaign.
* They agreed to not ask questions on certain subjects that would have been detrimental to Harris. The same considerations were not offered to Trump, nor did his campaign ask for them.
* “Sample” questions were provided to the Harris campaign and not to Trump’s.
* Fact-checks on Donald Trump were required by the Harris campaign.
* Harris was not to face comparable fact-checks.
* Split-screen views were required to favor Harris.
* It is noteworthy that the affidavit was signed, notarized, and mailed out BEFORE the debate.
The fact that everything the whistleblower detailed appears to have happened makes this exceedingly damning.
Can this turn into something big? Can this be used against the Harris campaign, ABC News, or both? It’s hard to tell. In a sane world this would be the bombshell that annihilates ABC News’ credibility and shreds the prospects for Team Kamala. Since we don’t live in a sane world there’s no telling whether this will be memory-holed, debunked, subjected to massive gaslighting, or a combination thereof.
We’ll see. All we know for sure is that if this is real and accurate, it needs to be shared far and wide.
Has this affidavit been filed with any court?
The affidavit is dated BEFORE the debate.
Some weird places for those redactions. Wonder what they were hiding.
Bombshell, how?
This has been MSM-moderated Debate S.O.P. for years.
https://x.com/mtgreenee/status/1835289676959064119
Marjorie Taylor Greene 🇺🇸
@mtgreenee
The ABC whistleblower who claimed Kamala Harris was given debate questions ahead of the debate has died in a car crash according to news reports.
“...allegations concerning her bother-in-law, Tony West...”
Who? What?
And, nothing will happen.
To his credibility, he posted before the debate that the questions were given to Harris, there was a whistleblower with in depth, personal knowledge of how events and negotiations happened prior to the debate, how Trump was not informed of "changes" to the debate rules that the Harris Campaign negotiated w/ABC and more.
I've personally spoken to him for several months and believe him to be a man of integrity and character. He's also announced he's filing a lawsuit against ABC for election interference, has a lawyer ready to go to file the suit and will not be taking any money from anyone to pay for the lawsuit.
His track record on his posts using sources he has is 100% for the time I've known him and I've no reason to doubt him now.
“...questions concerning her brother-in-law, Tony West...”
(Wish I could proof-read...)
bfl
Since the whistleblower's name is unknown, how can anyone possibly know they were killed in a car crash?
BTW: That "news report" was via a website spun up overnight, hosted in a foreign country with an anonymous domain name registrant listed. Hardly "credible" ... LOL!
And MTG fell for it hook line 'n sinker reposting it on her X account.
All you had to do is watch the “debate”. The evidence is there for all to see.
“ assurances regarding split-screen television views that would
favorably impact Kamala Harris’s appearance relative to
Donald Trump.”
You know what’s funny, the view they used for Trump they thought would make him seem ominous and come off as a crazy ranter.
But it didn’t. It made him look Kennedyesque.
The straight on frame was very flattering.
I’d thought myself that they’d chosen this framing because they thought it would make him look bad but it backfired.
Judge Merchan: Heather, did you finish the crosscut shredding of that junk mail? Please use the burn bag, too.
Why would it be?
Larry Sinclair, German raid on US election computers, vax poisons RNA and changes DNA, cats/dogs, debate affidavit — another in a long line of rightwing hoaxes that fizzle out embarrassingly.
What court would you file it with?
Trump taken to safety after Secret Service opens fire on man with possible gun at his Palm Beach golf club
New York Post ^ | 9/15/24 | Joe Marino
Posted on 9/15/2024, 12:44:03 PM by hardspunned
Donald Trump was taken to safety by the Secret Service after agents opened fire on a man who was spotted with what may have been a gun while the former president was on the links, according to law enforcement sources.
Sources said the Secret Service spotted a suspicious individual on the Trump International Golf Course West Palm Beach, and opened fire when agents saw what appeared to be the barrel of a gun.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
The split screen setup was to make sure that Trump didn’t look so much taller than the Camel, because she’s only about 5 foot tall and it would make him look superior.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.