The former president was kinder to Muir.
“I always liked him,” he said of the “World News Tonight” anchor. “I’m not going to watch him anymore. Because he’s not legit … And his hair is not as good as it used to be.”
Posted on 09/13/2024 10:50:35 AM PDT by Red Badger
Maybe they are waving their arms enough to get a real news source to report it.
Here’s something...
ABC should lose its license for 10 years,
and they should be tried for treason.
No one should be surprised, but Trump MUST use these facts and repeat them all the time.
They already admitted in 2016 that they have the questions to Hillary.
It’s one thing to call out ABC on this but this lies directly at the feet of Bob Iger and BobIgerCorp(R) that is once again doing political activism to actively harm and destroy America.
“Trump called Davis, who is Black, “nasty””
Is that off limits, even if true?
I have to keep reminding myself every time I think that a “news” channel can’t sink lower than CNN, that there’s always ABC.
I guess they claim that they aren’t really killing babies if they just leave them to die on their own. But they’d call the cops on you if you did that to a puppy or kitten.
Most of them generally are if they are in the Press..
The former president was kinder to Muir.
“I always liked him,” he said of the “World News Tonight” anchor. “I’m not going to watch him anymore. Because he’s not legit … And his hair is not as good as it used to be.”
It’s just the “guardrails” of “our democracy”.
Kamala can’t even claim that distinction (letting a baby die by ne GG I ect vs outright killing it) because she protected abortionists caught on Daleiden’s tape planning to allow late term babies to be born alive intact so they could butcher them and sell the body parts. I suppose it would be argued that they’d get the mother’s consent to have the parts “donated” and the abortionist would charge a lucrative “collector’s fee”. Semantics to cover up butchering fully born children. This is a prime chance for the real truth to get out.
I saw earlier where someone ran the entire debate through Grok or some other AI and asked it to analyze the transcript for biases. It returned four major biases by the moderators. The one-sided fact checks, the tone of voice, and the lack of follow-ups for Harris after she failed to answer questions. The final was Harris’ position on the stage, but as I recall that was determined by coin flip.
CertainlyNotNews and AlwaysBullCrapNews.
This....and MUCH MUCH more was in the works. And after the fact, too.
Virtually everything you see from MSNBC, CBS, ABC et al are supposed ruffled women journalists sniping on some little nuance word, or deed by Trump on the debate stage. If you want to call it something, call it a Misandrist Massacre, even aided by that d!ckless David Muir.
She was given the questions. She was coaxed by some Hollywood wonk on silent film facial expressions. She had blue tooth earrings. And she had the help of the infamous one-sided fact checker brigade.
It SHOWED the world what kind of job she could do as President, apparently none of it herself without massive help from her ‘friends’ in journalism.
It showed precisely why she isn’t the President now. [she and the machine could have rightfully easily 25th’d Biden months ago after his dementia debate but didn’t] This is why. She’d have already shown the world just how incompetent she really is and there’d still be time enough for an election to remedy that error.
The two abc dildoes used Kamarella for bait and she allowed them to do it. Worthless POS idiot.
Excellent points!
Then helicopters.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.