Posted on 08/14/2024 3:34:25 AM PDT by karpov
For nearly five decades, American universities systematically discriminated against white and Asian Americans. Quotas, “holistic review processes,” and “factors” were used to advance the Left’s racist social policies, first on the pretense that they remedied prior discrimination, next in alignment with the theory that diversity was good for the nation, and most recently to deal with the pretend phenomena known as “systemic racism” and “white privilege.”
Such racist, utopian scheming used to be called “affirmative action,” an innocuous term designed to conceal blatantly racist and unlawful discrimination. But despite the anodyne packaging, discrimination against whites and Asians violates the plain meaning of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (and amendments thereto) and the Fourteenth Amendment. It always has. Today, more Americans, including more white and Asian-American students, are fighting back against the Left’s racist university-admissions policies, scholarship eligibility criteria, and related practices.
These changes are happening around the nation, including in North Carolina’s leading institutions, with Duke walking back a race-based scholarship program on the heels of the Supreme Court’s momentous ruling against the University of North Carolina and Harvard College in 2023’s Students for Fair Admissions.
The Constitution and the nation’s paramount civil-rights laws prohibit the type of racism that, for 50 years, the Left has advanced. Indeed, only a lawyer with a particular ideological bent could ignore the plain meaning of Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment (No state shall “deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws”) or the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“No person … shall, on the ground of race … be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance”).
(Excerpt) Read more at jamesgmartin.center ...
Because they’re racist.
You racists.
Its not “sudden”. People have been fighting it for years and have recently been granted favorable court decisions allowing for a further dismantling of racist quotas.
lol. Exactly what I was going to post.
I wonder if they know they are racist and don’t care.
Or are just morons.
Theory: corrupt academia can’t survive without whitey’s money?
They practice the “good” kind of racism as opposed to the bad kind of racism you see......
My theory: the elites believe that successful whites can’t be controlled. Therefore only minorities are allowed to be successful—until they can’t be controlled.
Why do race-based scholarships even exist?
Iowa House GOP: Teaching About Systemic Racism Is Marxist
“Critical theory is simply Marxism that has been updated for the modern day,” Salmon said. “It is Marxism 2.0. What we are prohibiting is simply Marxism 2.0 training in our schools … Under this updated Marxism, the oppressed are to rise up and defeat and destroy the white class, which is the oppressor. So it’s very much the same thing, its just an updated form of Marxism.”
The writer is paying lip service, not gettng to the root of the issue. Even the BLM leaders say they were trained Marxists.
Identity politics is a mine field as bongino often says identity politics is by definition cannibalistic. BLM means Hispanic, Asian….. lives don’t. Put in policies that promote one over the others causes resentment by them.
Hispanic polling numbers are causing concern for the dims, as well as black men, Asians and Jews.
BTTT
To me, the fundamental problem with DEI is contained in the phrase:
Hire according to the constitution, by merit alone and you may be defacto guilty of racism or sexism if you end up with a lot of white guys. If they can convict you on the basis of your hires you’re gonna have to deal in some affirmative action types.
Special treatment is NOT equal treatment.
Because it’s all about skin color and sex and filling quotas, not skill, ability, integrity, or work ethic.
MLK’s dream crashed and burned a long time ago.
Very succinct.
That guy’s an idiot, the problem is right in the name.
Well, Kamala Harris wants “a future unburdened by the past”.
That has enormous ramifications:
Becoming unburdened by “past” descrimination kills the justification for affirmative action.
No more guilt for the Holocaust, so radical Muslims and other anti-Semites can call for renewed genocide of Jewish populations.
No more guilt for the ugly side of US history, like: genocide and dispossession of Native Americans; slavery; Jim Crow; segregation and separate but unequal facilities and education; mass incarceration of blacks for drug crimes; imperial expansion; hegemonic domination of much of the world; wars in the East and Middle East; polluting industries that poisoned the environment and created glowbile warming; giant corporations killing local economies/creating poverty; etc, etc.
So Kamala brings the gift of Joy with zero guilt, zero responsibility — we can all go buck wild. She is too stupid to notice that this evaporates the entire program of the Democrat Party.
1992 Hopwood v. Texas delt with the Univ. of TX granting admission into the Law Dept. lower scoring minorities over white students.
The 14th Amendment and the Civil Rights Act of 1964 were adopted to protect the rights of black people. So if you go by “original intent,” non-black people are not entitled to benefit from their protections.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.