I’ve seen what these things can do.
I’m saying there is no proof it was used for Biden yesterday. All we have is someone claiming that it was.
“ I’m saying there is no proof it was used for Biden yesterday. All we have is someone claiming that it was.”
Wrong
We also have Harris slipping up and almost referring to it as a recording rather than a call.
Your lack of suspicion is in itself suspicious.
You can think whatever you want to think. The demark point is when you try to get other people from questioning things. Why are you trying to stifle the discussion?