“ I’m saying there is no proof it was used for Biden yesterday. All we have is someone claiming that it was.”
Wrong
We also have Harris slipping up and almost referring to it as a recording rather than a call.
Your lack of suspicion is in itself suspicious.
You can think whatever you want to think. The demark point is when you try to get other people from questioning things. Why are you trying to stifle the discussion?
It could very well have been a recording. Biden does pretty well reading a speech, and with a recording you can edit out the flubs.
It seems to me that the attempt here is to suggest he’s dead or unconscious. We don’t have any proof of that.
I can’t stop anyone from questioning things, and I can’t ‘stifle’ a conversation. I assume everyone has a mind of their own, just as I do - I am speaking my mind and everyone else is doing the same. (I haven’t suggested that you and others are trying to stifle ME; but I could easily do so.)
I’m sorry you think I’m ‘suspicious’, but fortunately what you ‘think’ isn’t my problem. Nor is your obvious suggestion that I should think as other people do.
In this case, I just don’t.