Posted on 07/08/2024 3:58:21 AM PDT by davikkm
A family in Concord NH have violent, armed vagabonds camping out on their property. These libtard parents refuse to protect their family and home, even after receiving death threats from these armed trespassers.
(NH is a stand-your-ground state, so there’s no excuse for them not to use deadly force):
Family calls cops 37 times, receives death threats from encampment of violent vagabonds behind dream home: ‘I can’t even use my backyard’ … Robin Bach and her husband spent years restoring their 19th-century dream home in Concord to raise their two children, ages 8 and 11 — but have been plagued by the campers living in the woods behind the palatial abode.
(Excerpt) Read more at citizenwatchreport.com ...
Vagabonds? Is that what they are calling the homeless druggie illegal aliens now?
But, I don't agree with the above headline, either. The NY Post has a different headline:
What do people want these parents to do? I can think of a few creative ideas, but the parents are outnumbered. The law seems to be the problem there.
Right now, the police keep arresting the trespassers and then releasing them. Obviously, that strategy isn't working.
When she said, “You can put your tent here, here’s bathrooms, dumpsters,” she was referring to what would happen if the city had a “designated campsite in the city.”
In the full NY Post article, she says she got a quote to put a chain link fence around the property, but it would cost $50,000.
I’d try reading that article again. It mentions the camp being behind the home and a man from the tents at one point coming onto their property.
The encampment on Bach’s property poses a unique challenge because it borders property and train tracks owned by CSX
If that statement is true, then the encampment is on the family's property. I know families who own acres of land, most of it woods behind their backyards.
I once owned a house with a fenced backyard that bordered the woods. That wooded area was private property owned by someone else, but sometimes people would walk through it. At least once, the police chased someone through it, but there was no homeless encampment there.
Why do you claim that? I see no basis for that conclusion, and other lines in the article suggest otherwise.
The article refers to it as “the encampment on Bach’s property.”
The article could be wrong, but that’s what’s written.
Wow... I found an article in their local Concord paper.
It’s written more clearly:
https://www.concordmonitor.com/Robin-Bach-has-homeless-camp-in-her-backyard-woods-55684461
It makes clear that the encampment is on the family’s property.
And the parents are waaaaaay too accommodating.
Some trash and some trespassing, which could give them the liberty to referring to it as an “encampment” on their land, but it clearly states that the city could sweep the tents by way of their access/responsibility on the CSX land.
I don’t believe for a minute that the couple of tents they could see through the trees when they bought the house were/are on their private property.
My take is that both papers have stretched and obfuscated the specifics of the situation to draw clicks.
Ironically, from “It’s All Over Now, Baby Blue”.
Sorry to belabor tbis. I think she wants the fence costs to seem unaffordable, as part of a media strategy to force the City to lure the squatters away with “kindness” (free housing, food, healthcare, services, etc.). The City knows that would end up attracting more “vagabonds” from far and wide, wrecking property values, causing huge public expense, and property tax hikes to pay for it all.
If chain link fencing costs $50,000, T-posts with 2 strands of barbed wire might be a tenth of that, and could define her property line sufficiently to eliminate one of the city’s excuses for not arresting/evicting the trespassers. She does not appear to want to solve her trespassing/squatting problem via eviction.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.