The encampment on Bach’s property poses a unique challenge because it borders property and train tracks owned by CSX
If that statement is true, then the encampment is on the family's property. I know families who own acres of land, most of it woods behind their backyards.
I once owned a house with a fenced backyard that bordered the woods. That wooded area was private property owned by someone else, but sometimes people would walk through it. At least once, the police chased someone through it, but there was no homeless encampment there.
Why do you claim that? I see no basis for that conclusion, and other lines in the article suggest otherwise.