Why bother even mentioned that he won an adjacent nobel prize? They watered down their prestige ages ago, even before they awarded a price to Barack Obama just for being Barack Obama, before he even had a chance to do anything except get elected, because they were too impatient to wait that long and even make a pretense of it.
Well, nearly every article written with him quoted in it usually says 'Nobel Prize winning Economist'.
Until I read this piece I did not know his award was an 'adjacent' prize.
I guess that's like a 'Major Award':
...............