Posted on 05/23/2024 9:53:21 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
-PJ
“What’s the point of even having a trial if we rig the jury? Nothing good will come from it”
Judge Cannon seems patient and measured, maintaining order and consistency, and allowing zero short cuts.
Doesn’t matter ..the outcome has already been determined...even before this went to trial.
Judge Cannon shows what actual professionalism in the courtroom looks like. The Colombia migrant RAT-appointed Merchan should take some lessons from her.
“the outcome has already been determined...even before this went to trial”
You mind expounding on that?
Just making the prosecution follow the procedural rules is driving them crazy. That shows 1)arrogance, 2)laziness, and 3)poor trial prep (because they thought they wouldn’t have to).
What’s to expound..?
Everything from Russia collusion..to both impeachments .. The “evidence” is weak and the testimony is lame and proves nothing....and everyone involved in this bogus witch hunt should do the right thing and eat lead.
Mephistopheles
Are you confusing New York with Florida? I bet she throws it out.
I was hoping to get in before the pissemists who always say (when something goes right for us): “It won’t change anything; it won’t do any good.”
I have to believe there’s always hope. I think it’s why Joshua told the Israelites to keep their mouths shut as they circled Jericho. He knew of their propensity to bellyache about God and His leaders.
I also think about Gen. Washington losing battle after battle, from pillar to post, until they finally were able to administer the coup de grace in the end. That’s how patriotic Americans think.
Why would anyone be negative about the MAL case? The judge has already exposed major holes in the prosecution, likely with more to come. They’re going to have to rehab their approach, and we are months from the start of trial.
Judge Canon has figured out what’s going on in this case. I bet she throws it out along with Smith and the rest of the trash.
That's because they thought that DOJ would get to try Trump in front of the Kangaroos of the DC Circuit, forgetting that since they raided Mar-a-Lago, the offenses occurred in Florida and would have to be heard there despite the legally dubious DC grand jury used to indict.
Oops...it felt kind of good to rant anyhow.
I suspect she is going to expose the criminal conspiracy to target Trump to the public and then issue a ruling confirming that Smith was illegally appointed and has no legal standing to even preside over his prosecutions in DC and Florida.
What does a prosecutor on the wrong side of the issue do when he's cornered like a mouse?
(And the law certainly doesn't comport with the prosecutor's alleged criminal behavior, what's Harbach going to do? It's more than curious that there is no video or transcription of the meeting, as would be de rigeur.)
Nauta's lawyer made clear he was prepared to take the witness stand to swear to the truth of the multiple lawyers' career-ending and prison-terminating judgeship bribery issue, as represented.
At that point, rather than for Harbach merely to pound the table and say it just didn't happen, that the accused prosecutor didn't boldly intervene to say that he was prepared to swear under oath that nothing like it ever happened was an overriding tell.
What’s the point of even having a trial if we rig the jury.
The jurors in the Trump cases are just props their votes have already been stamped guilty.
Brown envelopes to be handed out after trial.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.