Breaking: House Democrats Vote UNANIMOUSLY to Give Illegal Aliens Representation in Congress and the Electoral College

Gateway Pundit ^ | May 9, 2024 | Jim Hoft

[LoveMyFreedom]

Here we go… House Democrats on Wednesday night voted unanimously to give illegal aliens – including Joe Biden’s 11 million illegal border crossers – representation in Congress and the Electoral College.

Democrats continue to put Americans and American workers in line behind alien invaders.

The House vote was 206 to 202 with 22 representatives 11 Democrats and 11 Republicans abstaining from the vote.

Steven Miller reported: “House Dems just voted UNANIMOUSLY to give illegals representation in Congress AND the Electoral College. House Seats and Electoral College votes WILL BE added to areas with the most illegals (including all Biden illegals) unless Senate passes the bill. Invasion by design.”

[Vaduz]

The Democrat Party is clearly lawless.

Communists winning again this is as 1984 as it gets.

[Salman]

So it wasn't a paranoid conspiracy theory after all?

Will you accept the results of the election or are you a traitor?

[butlerweave]

Illegals have already started DEMANDING MORE FREE STUFF so taxpayers better start paying more

[C210N]

The Constitution uses the term “persons” for apportionment...

Kinda odd, given that a corporation is a 'person'. Black's Law.

3rd edition, 'person'.

"The term is, however, more extensive than man. It may include artificial beings, as corporations;

The world of difference between the terms 'person' and 'people'.

[zzeeman]

Very confusing headline and article, based on a Tweet by Stephen Miller. The bill (HR 7109) passed. Summary:

This bill requires any questionnaire used in the decennial census to include a checkbox or other similar option for respondents to indicate whether the respondent and each household member is a U.S. citizen.

The Department of Commerce must make public the number of citizens and noncitizens in each state.

The bill also requires that the statement sent by the President to Congress indicating the number of persons in each state (related to the reapportionment of U.S. Representatives) excludes noncitizens.

It is doubtful that the bill will be taken up in the Senate, thereby dying on the vine...

[PIF]

Based on which part of the US Constitution
—

you are waaay behind:
some of the Constitution was voided under Noxious Nixon;
a lot of the Constitution was voided under B. Clinton;
most of the rest under 0bama;
and the few remaining paragraphs erased under Biden.

There is no US constitution in effect at present.

[chopperk]

Seems Marxist Dems have destroyed the Sovereignty of the USA.

[rktman]

NOT the Bee! Sadly!

[bgill]

Are they so stupid as to let illegals take their jobs?

Every day they prove to the world how much they hate their children and grandchildren. They are turning their children’s future into a SF sidewalk.

[bitt]

p

[Jane Long]

It is doubtful that the bill will be taken up in the Senate, thereby dying on the vine...

---

Praying so.

Do we know who the 11 Repubs are, who abstained from the vote?

[griswold3]

Let’s close the barn door after the cows get out. That’ll work.
I wonder how the “progressives” think they will be able to govern?

[zzeeman]

Here are the 11 Rs not voting:

Actually, this bill was a positive move in that it would at least attempt to ascertain if the census respondents were citizens or not. (Currently there is no way of doing this.) And also require that only the count of citizens be used in the apportionment.

That is why the Senate will likely not touch it...

[PubliusMM]

It passed the House, 206 to 202 on a strict party line.

The actual legislation is to add a citizenship question to the decennial census and to limit apportionment of House seats and electoral votes based ONLY ON ACTUAL US CITIZENS, rather than all persons.

[Jane Long]

The usual TX RINO (several retiring) suspects.

Thanks, zzeeman.

[libertylover]

Based on which part of the US Constitution, did they decide that and vote that?

Yes, the Supreme Court ruled that Biden couldn't unilaterally forgive student loans, but he did it anyway (to buy votes with taxpayer money).

[circlecity]

They didn’t make it pass. It looks like the final vote was 206-202 against.

[circlecity]

Wait, maybe it did pass but what passed doesn’t do what the article suggests.

[9YearLurker]

Yes, by not voting at all and so not voting against it, they made it pass.

One of the oldest, most sniveling congress critter tricks in the books.

[9YearLurker]

And you are correct, that the article is written to exaggerate and misrepresent.

The simple truth is damning enough.