part of the issue is people are no longer allowed to build affordable homes.
homes could still be built on blocks or piers, with no central heat and air and no appliances a little insulation on small lots very close to the neighbors, but cities don’t allow those types of homes to be built anymore.
Standard M.O. for illegally shifting money from the project into other people’s pockets.
Not a surprise at all!
Really.
When government doesn’t want to deal with certain issues, such as the FBI with pedophilia and the male homosexual community (last data is from cira 1994), they stop collecting metrics. That way they don’t have to report something they are going to get attacked about/with.
If they have to collect the data, they obfuscate it with definitions and new categories to make sure it all gets dropped in a different bucket, example: lone wolf, self radicalized, home grown, which are almost exclusively used for Islamic terrorism and serve to draw attention away from a politically incorrect idea that there might be an issue with Islam.
Bottom line: it makes total sense that government does not have these figures since they don’t want them known. Don’t ask ques that might give answers you really don’t want to hear!
A quarter of a million per homeless person … POOF! GONE!!
How’s the audit for the bullet train coming along?
$24 billion could have built many thousands of homes and tax breaks for companies that could employ people. $100k for a home would be 240,000 homes, $200k would be 120,000 homes.
(check my math)