Attorneys General. Just sayin’...
Attorneys General, not “attorney generals.”
Conservatives need to learn the proper writing skills.
“Shall not be infringed”
I’m afraid the American People are going to have to overturn them themselves. The SCOTUS has gone full left, shickenchit. They are our Bill of Rights. They don’t belong to the U.S. Government or the SCOTUS.
Here is another Second Amendment case on the issue of magazine bans winding its way through the courts. This one is in the Fourth Circuit.
“Fourth Circuit Shenanigans Should Be Called Out by SCOTUS”
From the article:
“In December of 2022 a three-judge panel on the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in a case called Bianchi v. Brown that challenges Maryland’s ban on so-called assault weapons. The Supreme Court had granted cert to Bianchi in the immediate wake of the Bruen decision, but vacated the Fourth Circuit’s previous decision upholding the ban and remanded the case back to the Fourth Circuit for a re-hearing based on the findings in Bruen.
Gun owners had been waiting for that panel to release its decision for over a year, but last Friday the Fourth Circuit took the almost unprecedented step of declaring that it was taking the case en banc before the panel issued its decision. I was dealing with some of my wife’s medical issues on Friday and didn’t have the opportunity to weigh in until now, which is probably a good thing given that my immediate response to the news wasn’t exactly family-friendly.”
Nobody pulling out the 14th A. blanket like the Left did w/ “g@y ‘marriage’”. ‘Our side’ merely splits hairs, the Left/Stat/Global-ists push through w/o hesitation.
“...Second Amendment and the term “Arms” does not apply to AR-15s because of their militaristic appearance....”
I guess they’re giving up on the “well regulated militia” canard. It must not have been working.
EC
ping
My home state of Kansas is a Constitutional Carry state. The framers were pretty explicit:
§ 4. Individual right to bear arms; armies. A person has the right to keep and bear arms for the defense of self, family, home and state, for lawful hunting and recreational use, and for any other lawful purpose; but standing armies, in time of peace, are dangerous to liberty, and shall not be tolerated, and the military shall be in strict subordination to the civil power.
It doesn’t state anything about what type of arm I can own whether it be a flintlock rifle or an M240. I think the Federal Constitution should be amended to include that verbiage.