Posted on 03/01/2024 5:29:23 AM PST by Red Badger
UPDATED: A federal judge has found Catherine Herridge in civil contempt of his order that she reveal the source of stories she wrote when she worked for Fox News.
U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper set a fine of $800 per day, but he stayed the ruling to give her time to appeal.
The judge had ordered Herridge to reveal her sources for 2017 stories that reported on a federal investigation of Yanping Chen, a naturalized U.S. citizen who founded the University of Management and Technology in Virginia. The stories had to do with Chen’s affiliations with the Chinese military. The FBI investigation examined statements she made on immigration forms about her work in China in the 1980s.
Chen was not charged, but sued the federal government, claiming that someone leaked information about her to Herridge and Fox in violation of the Privacy Act.
Herridge since went to work for CBS News, but was laid off earlier this month.
“The Court does not reach this result lightly,” Cooper wrote in his order. “It recognizes the paramount importance of a free press in our society and the critical role that confidential sources play in the work of investigative journalists like Herridge. Yet the Court also has its own role to play in upholding the law and safeguarding judicial authority. Applying binding precedent in this Circuit, the Court resolved that Chen’s need for the requested information to vindicate her rights under the Privacy Act overcame Herridge’s qualified First Amendment reporter’s privilege in this case.”
Read the judge’s contempt order against Catherine Herridge.
\https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.202751/gov.uscourts.dcd.202751.193.0_3.pdf
Herridge had been subpoenaed to give a deposition in the case last year, but she refused to reveal her sources when she sat for questioning in September.
Fox News and Herridge had tried to quash the subpoena, asserting a qualified First Amendment reporter’s privilege, or urging the court to adopt a federal common law newsgathering privilege. But the judge ultimately issued an order that “Chen may depose Herridge regarding the identity and intent of the source or sources of the documents and images allegedly provided to her in violation of the Privacy Act, and any non-privileged other matters relevant to her Privacy Act claim.”
In his opinion, the judge seemed to dismiss the idea that fewer sources would come forward if courts are compelling more reporters to disclose their sources. “At a minimum, any marginal chilling effect has certainly not frozen the information pipeline. Instances of journalism built on confidential sources remain legion,” the judge wrote.
Cooper also noted the lack of a federal shield law, writing that Congress could resolve the issue with a “few strokes of a pen, but it has not done so.”
“Absent congressional intervention or a shift in Circuit precedent, the Court’s duty is to apply and enforce the law on the books,” the judge wrote.
Patrick Philbin, Herridge’s attorney, said in a statement, “We disagree with the district court’s decision, and to protect Ms. Herridge’s First Amendment rights, we intend to appeal.”
A Fox News spokesperson said in a statement, “Holding a journalist in contempt for protecting a confidential source has a deeply chilling effect on journalism. Fox News Media remains committed to protecting the rights of a free press and freedom of speech and believes this decision should be appealed.”
Next up from the Swamp? Three FBI SWAT teams ‘visiting’ her home at 0500Hrs, guns drawn, shields up, with dogs...to execute a ‘search warrant’ for some unfounded reason.
Sad days for justice in America.
As they days go by and I see the actions and behavior of federal judges, the word “contempt” seems a word best directed in their direction.
Me too
I think it’s time impeaching judges became more of a thing!
Couldn’t agree more!
In other legal news, JUST IN: The D.C. Circuit has ruled that some Jan. 6 defendants had their sentences improperly lengthened by district judges’ decisions to label their crimes “interference with the administration of justice.”
Link to the court’s order here:
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24452522-brock
There hasn’t been an article written up on the ruling yet since the opinion has just been filed. I’m sure Julie Kelly will address the ruling once she has had an opportunity to dissect it.
Praise the Lord!......................
To that end Trump might consider announcing the release of the residential addresses of all federal judges. Things might go a lot smoother for him during his next term then.
This picture is worth a thousand words.
She should give them copies of her documentation with big ol’ redacting ink coverings. You know, like all the subpoena results we get from The White House and FIB.
Cooper, an Obama stooge-judge, is married to Amy Jeffress, a former Justice Department official and national security counselor to former United States Attorney General Eric Holder.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.