Posted on 02/02/2024 10:46:04 AM PST by Kazan
There is a slew of reports that Friday will be General Zaluzhny’s last day as the head of Ukraine’s Armed Forces. I don’t know what will happen. I cannot rule out that the press reports are an information operation based on wishful thinking. Then again, it may be real. I plan on doing a podcast tomorrow around noon to talk about what transpired in the Ukraine soap opera. Kudos to Alex Christoforou for dubbing this “Days of Kiev.” An homage to the legendary U.S. soap, Days of Our Lives. There is no one alive and involved in the U.S. Government who was part of the lethal clown show in Vietnam that led to the overthrow of President Diem. Is it possible that the term, Zelensky, is Ukrainian for Vietnam’s Diem? We’ll see.
John Helmer, who publishes at Dancing With Bears, translated an article by Yevgeny Krutikov, a Russian military analyst who served with the GRU. I am providing the full article because it illuminates one aspect of Russia’s strategy in the Donbas.
“ 'The settlement of Tabayevka in the Kharkov region has been liberated,' the Russian Defense Ministry says. We are not just facing the capture of a village: Russian troops are now hacking into the contact lines, which have not budged for a year. Russia is creating a new strategic situation in the Kharkov region, threatening to dismember the Ukrainian defence up to the Donetsk agglomeration.
First, Krakhmalnoye, then Tabayevka – Russian troops have advanced in the Svatovo direction (Kharkov region), pushing the enemy to a new line of defence (to the village of Peschanoye). Slightly to the north, already close to Kupyansk, the enemy’s positions are also gradually moving to the west and southwest.
Along the way, forests are being cleared, which the VSU [Ukrainian Armed Forces] is turning into fortified areas, even giving them names (“Alligator” and “Woodpecker”). The enemy is losing the old lines of trenches, the first line of contact has been destroyed. Something similar is happening directly near Kupyansk, but there the advanced fortified lines in Sinkovka are being held still by the VSU, though the positions on the flanks have gradually begun to sink.
At first glance, we are looking at isolated episodes of positional warfare, since the big, iconic and recognizable geographical names do not appear in the information releases. But this is not quite true.
Firstly, even in this scenario as published so far, strategic threats arise for the Armed Forces of Ukraine, for example, in the possible drive of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation to the Oskol River which has far-reaching prospects. Notwithstanding, it is still impossible to predict when this will become possible in practice.
Secondly, the enemy has been demonstrating a systemic defence crisis in the Kupyansk direction during the past week. The defence of Kupyansk has been under construction by the Armed Forces of Ukraine since the spring of last year, when the decision was made in Kiev on a ‘counteroffensive’ in the southern direction. New brigades with western armoured vehicles were sent to the southern section of the contact line, and Kupyansk and the area around it were designated for defence with the rest of their forces.
In Kiev, they were convinced that Russian troops were forming an offensive group in the Kupyansk direction, and so the VSU began to wait there for a frontal assault. However, as a result, the Russian Army did not undertake anything of the kind in this area. Instead, the Ukrainian units were gradually ground down by the Russian army in positional battles, while the Kupyansk group of the VSU had to be replenished with whatever troops were left.
Now Ukrainian sources are complaining that as a consequence, a combination of lines has formed in the sinkhole areas (that’s the same Krakhmalnoye and Tabayevka). Into these lines the VSU has herded separate battalions from different units, with the result that unified management and command have been lost, and the performance quality of the troops has left much to be desired.
As a result, the VSU is considering the possibility of transferring the remnants of those forces which participated in the failed ‘counteroffensive”’ to Kupyansk from the southern direction. Before that, they had been sent in great haste sent to Avdeyevka.
But this is already a systemic problem for the Armed Forces of Ukraine, since there is trouble in the southern sector. The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation have gradually regained some of the positions which were left during the so-called counteroffensive, and these forces continue to move forward. We are even talking about possible threats to Orekhov, a rearguard city for the VSU, from which all the communications and command of the ‘counteroffensive’ had been carried out.
Behind the defensive fortifications of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, an open field for tens of kilometres opens up on a whole group of sites. Kiev’s military reserves are gradually being squandered, and there is practically no human materiel left to plug the holes. Related to these problems there are the panic campaigns in Kiev about total mobilization.
There is another problem: the attrition of officers. Western military personnel cannot replace this crucial resource — they can only be used to service technically complicated weapons systems such as air defence or long-range artillery. Along the line of contact, foreign officers are more likely to interfere due to their ignorance of the language and misunderstanding of the mentality of the [Ukrainian] subordinates.
There are other factors weakening the Ukrainian defence, but they are not directly related to military operations. For example, the Western sponsors are really concerned about the corruption of the Ukrainian leadership. The inspections and audits which are taking place in Kiev on this issue right now are preventing Ukraine from building new defensive lines swiftly enough.
Another non-military factor: political discord among the various factions of the Ukrainian authorities. The premonition of defeat is triggering a drop in morale, not only in the troops, but also in the elites.
All this in general creates a strategic opportunity for Russia to seriously change the situation on the line of contact.
Partial tactical successes must at some point turn into a major breakthrough in the enemy’s defence. Moreover, we are talking about such a breakthrough that will not stop in just two or three days at the next defensive line, but will lead inevitably, precisely, to the collapse of the front. This is exactly what the efforts of the Russian Armed Forces are now aimed at, probing for the weaknesses in Ukrainian defensive positions.
The liberation of Tabayevka is an example of just such an approach. Sooner or later, the VSU will not have time to create a new defensive line behind a particular settlement. And then we will see how the special operation will break the current positional deadlock."
If the comedian Zelensky manages to remove General Zaluzhny and replace him with Intel Chief Budanov we can expect more chaos among Ukrainian forces facing off against Russia. I am not suggesting that Zaluzhny is a great military leader or strategist, but he does understand the complexity of running a combined arms military operation. Budanov does not and will not have time to learn the ropes.
Ukraine confronts two deficits that cannot be remedied for at least one year — 1) lack of trained manpower and 2) lack of ammunition, air defense and reliable combat vehicles. Russia enjoys a clear tactical advantage on both counts.
Helmer succinctly describes Russia’s plan for the near term:
"When the General Staff have been discussing with President Vladimir Putin the timing of the Russian offensive to force the Kiev regime into capitulation, it has been agreed, understood, and repeated that the strategic reserves of the Ukrainian forces should be destroyed first, together with the supply lines for the weapons and ammunition crossing the border from the US and the NATO allies.
This process, they also agreed, should take as long as required with least casualties on the Russian side, as determined by military intelligence. Also agreed and pre-conditional, there should be no repeat of the political intelligence failures of the Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) which precipitated the failed special forces operation known as the Battle of Antonov (Hostomel) Airport from February 24 to April 2, 2022."
I recommend you read his full piece.
If the US and other nations don't protect Ukraine now it will be impossible to convince any nation in the future not to arm themselves with nuclear weapons.
If Ukraine manages to fight off the Russians without our aid they will probably set about developing nuclear weapons.
And then we'll have another nuclear armed nation - one with some of the most modern drones and a large army with combat experience.
It is in the interest of our nation to have them on our side.
You’re right on. Thank you.
You’re exactly right. They smell of sulfur....you know what I mean.
Only an idiot believe that. There is absolutely NO evidence to backup that claim.
In fact, the pro-Ukraine BBC has only been able to find this many total causalities on the Russian side:
https://en.zona.media/article/2022/05/20/casualties_eng
43,460
Russian casualties corroborated by publicly available data as of 2 February
Mediazona, in collaboration with BBC News Russian service and a team of volunteers, continues gathering information on the Russian military casualties in Ukraine. The figures we provide are sourced from publicly available information, including social media posts from family members, local media coverage, and official statements from local authorities.
For the States, united, to make a binding promise to a foreign country requires consent from the states in the form of 2/3 of their delegates (the Senators) to ratify something called a treaty.
In the case of Ukraine there is a piece of paper signed by Bill Clinton, which has no binding effect on the 50 states which would have to provide the men and the money to fight a war.
Not really. This is all the total Russian causalities this media site could find:
https://en.zona.media/article/2022/05/20/casualties_eng
43,460
Russian casualties corroborated by publicly available data as of 2 February
Mediazona, in collaboration with BBC News Russian service and a team of volunteers, continues gathering information on the Russian military casualties in Ukraine. The figures we provide are sourced from publicly available information, including social media posts from family members, local media coverage, and official statements from local authorities
If we had ignored Ukraine after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Ukraine was more likely to keep their nukes.
Russia had the codes, but if Ukraine really needed the codes, they would find a way to get them.
Russia may get angry at Ukraine for not giving up their nukes. But what will they do about it?
Just look at North Korea. Everyone leaves them alone.
They just call them mercenaries.
Many times that:
WASHINGTON, Dec 12 (Reuters) - A declassified U.S. intelligence report assessed that the Ukraine war has cost Russia 315,000 dead and injured troops, or nearly 90% of the personnel it had when the conflict began, a source familiar with the intelligence said on Tuesday.
The report also assessed that Moscow’s losses in personnel and armored vehicles to Ukraine’s military have set back Russia’s military modernization by 18 years, the source said.
Anything coming out of the Biden regime is propaganda, including from the woke military.
Translated from Putin Fanbois speak: "I can't refute all the bad news coming out Russia, so I will deem it 'propaganda' and ignore it."
If Russia had suffered anywhere near that many causalities, there would obituaries in Russian newspapers, images of from funerals and gravesites on Russian social media and Russian hospitals would be overflowing. There is all that on the Ukrainian side.
You missed Trump's latest flip-flop where he said that Europe will need to match the dollar amount of U.S. aid to Ukraine.
Careful there Kazan. You are deviating from the Putin Fanboi non-responsive response playlist:
demand a response to a previous answer
insinuate the poster is homosexual
demand links to the authority for poster's comment (which you will ignore when posted)
denounce the post as propaganda
insinuate the poster is homosexual
post a nonsensical statement, followed by "LOL"
insinuate the poster is homosexual (that's the Putin Fanbois' favorite)
I posted that list nearly six months ago, after 18 months of observing Putin Fanbois, and clearly, after denouncing a post as "propaganda," you were supposed to call me homosexual, not a numbskull. You deviated from the Putin Fanbois non-responsive response play list. Are you a deviate Kazan, or did you guys have a meeting, and change the play list?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.