It should be dismissed WITH prejudice (i.e., cannot be re-filed). I think the author didn’t understand what “without prejudice” meant, namely that the case could be re-filed.
Agree
Seems more likely she will be replaced and the case will go on. That only after the ahole Kemp is forced to remove her.
+1
Exactly. That jumped right out at me. With prejudice means exactly what you said, that the case can never be reopened.
Oh, by the way, last night I read a RUMOR - emphasis on rumor - that governor Kemp was somehow romantically involved with Fanny Willis. To me, this means that some defendant in that case must make a motion to a higher court to have the entire case thrown out, because the governor’s office will never order the AG in there. Again, to be clear, this is strictly a RUMOR. Nonetheless, Kemp has proven his hostility to Trump over time, and even if the rumor is untrue, he does not exactly come to this whole situation with clean hands.
+2
Agree with you about the word “prejudice”.
That error alone reflects very poorly on the article writer’s ability to communicate; suggests he/she is less than competent as a reporter of legal matters.
I agree that this case should be dismissed *with* prejudice.
That said, the author does understand what “without prejudice” means, as he explains in his article.