Posted on 09/09/2023 11:38:22 AM PDT by Roman_War_Criminal
I am sorry for your loss and sincerely wish that all of us (me included) will continue to demand that we stop these shots until we honestly and objectively evaluate what has happened in the past few years.
Otherwise, your story (and those of so many others) will be repeated because college kids are still getting the shot.
I find your tagline more than a little ironic. Do you live in an echo chamber?
Apparently these Covid-19 shots have a way of waking up dormant cancer cells amongst others, affecting some but not everyone. Either way I am glad I decided not to be a test case..
Check out Dr. John Campbell’s Youtube channel. He collates and analyzes official govt statistics on excess deaths post-vax. Including causes of death. Covers UK, US, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand.
Scarpetta wrote: “I find your tagline more than a little ironic. Do you live in an echo chamber?”
There are many anti-vaxxers here on FR that continuously scour the internet for scare stories about the vaccines. They are picking ‘the experts that say the things they agree with’.
Indeed, that is correct. However considering the massive fraud in the [so-called] covid statistics we have been given, serious skepticism is in order.
Think of it this way, "they" have made certain we don't have and never will have *accurate* statistics. Thus proof in that form will not be forthcoming.
However, other statistical anomalies can provide useful information. Abnormal increases in certain types of cancers, physicians that report (even anecdotally) large increases in certain types of illnesses.
At the very least, the massive and draconian censorship efforts by pro jab institutions (government, big pharma, medical institutions) should cause serious concern as to the reliability of ANY information we get from them. Why? Who benefits from such censorship? They are not doing it for no reason.
I can’t tell you how hard it is to know I maybe could have prevented all of it. I’m including the absolute torture inflected on him in the name of treatment, when the doctors knew all along it was a lost cause. His tumor grew so large, so fast it burst in his abdomen and poisoned his bloodstream.
His mother blames protein drinks and my husband is in complete denial. My son lost his only sibling and that breaks my heart.
Sorry to offend your delicate sensibilities.
That aside, is there any way of knowing whether cancers that appear to “come out of nowhere” and kill within a month were in fact not present to any degree whatsoever 32 days prior?
I am sorry for your loss, and in no way question whether the vax could be responsible for creating or accelerating cancers. My question had to do with going from no cancer (which I don’t think can ever be established with certainty) to dead within a month.
do offshore wind turbines kill whales?
Excellent...
However, it has been apparent that obamy was a communist since he was dubbed as a “very clean” negro...
In 2007, IMHO, there was no one on FR who thought that obamy was anything other than a communist...
Turns out he was, and is, a despicable anti-American traitor who did exactly what he wanted to accomplish...
He took over the tyrannical trend started by Bush and never looked back...
Have to give him credit for that...
Welcome to the post Vax world.
this is shockingly sad. I am praying for EYES to open and people quit turning their lives over to the devil. I also prayed for healing for these people
This is an amazing book—after you read it you will never trust any statistics ever again:
https://www.amazon.com/How-Lie-Statistics-Darrell-Huff/dp/0393310728
There are 3.2 million FTE teachers in the US. At any given time, 5.5% of Americans will have cancer of some form.
This means there are about 176,000 teachers with cancer, at any given time.
I am pretty sure this article is not representing a new phenomenon.
It is sad whenever anyone develops a cancer.
You see how you just used some pretty wild thinking to come around to, “Anecdotes without statistics are OK because all of the statistics are fixed”.
Not all reporting is fixed. Not all anecdotes are false.
But you have to look at these things objectively. And there is no objective measure that indicates people are dying at anything but a normal and expected rate.
Cancers are being detected at a higher rate over the past year or so because patients ignored symptoms and put off screening during the pandemic.
There are statistically significant increases in expected death rates - also note my response to your assertion below
Cancers are being detected at a higher rate over the past year or so because patients ignored symptoms and put off screening during the pandemic.
That is an unproven assumption. More to the point, it is as unprovable as what you claim my suggestions are.
If....if your assumption is correct, then the increases in cancer will taper off, back to previous levels in the near future. Let's see what happens.
Could you direct me to your source on unexpected deaths—because the CDC metrics that go back years indicate no increase in any age group past the months with COVID in 20-21.
The cancer numbers will reflect what I am saying…we are seeing it in the cancer centers where my wife works and where she was a patient. People are coming in with cancers that were not detected because screenings were missed. They are coming in more advanced and required more “extreme” actions.
I have no idea nor do I see any connection to the relevance of this article. I am sure it is some sort of what aboutism. But I choose not to comment outside of the area of my expertise, something that is missing around here.
Not seeing the link but not surprised either. The vax infected idiots are dealing with or delay with their decision. Shxt happens and under no circumstances would I donate to any of these idiots go fund me crap.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.