Posted on 09/08/2023 2:23:47 PM PDT by DFG
Famed cardiologist Dr. Anish Koka has expressed his regret at “regurgitating the party line” on mRNA vaccines being “safe and effective” for young people, vowing he would never behave the same way in a similar situation.
Koka, a cardiologist with degrees from Penn State and Temple University trained at Jefferson Health, said he “certainly saw an increase” in heart conditions at his Philadelphia clinic after mRNA vaccines were rolled out en masse, “…like many of us in the cardiology community did.”
“It’s undeniable,” he stressed.
Koka was especially regretful about his personal role in propagandizing for the vaccines: “Me running around saying it’s ‘safe and effective,’ and giving it to 17-year-olds, given that most of the patients that were in the vaccine studies weren’t 17-years-old — I wasn’t technically correct.”
“I wasn’t correct at all in saying it was safe and effective because there weren’t enough people in that group to say that,” he lamented, emphasizing that he “would not give it to low-risk people again. That was a mistake on my part.”
Koka is particularly concerned by a Thai study that found an alarming number of cardiac injuries among minor teens given the Pfizer vaccine, particularly as the Moderna vaccine “has been shown to have myocarditis rates 3-4x Pfizer.”
(Excerpt) Read more at thenationalpulse.com ...
Still here.
We would have very few doctors left if we applied your standard.
At least he can admit it.... I have far more respect for him than his peers who continue to remain silent even as people are still getting the shot.
—> At least he can admit it.... I have far more respect for him than his peers who continue to remain silent even as people are still getting the shot.
💯
LOL...at least you admit you’re a FRoctor. :)
(Note....NOT necessarily known to be REAL docs.)
Are you STILL recommending Pfizerbucks China Virus $hots, FRoctor?
Highly likely.
They are still around. I suspect the money isn't as good anymore.
He followed the money, not the science. He is not a doctor but a politician.
Recommend?
For some people, under some conditions yes I do.
3 doses max, 0, 2 and 6 months, no mandates, no one under 50.
I don’t know how you can possibly think informed consent is possible for any of the CoupFlu vaxxes.
Let’s not bicker and argue over who killed who... right???
“He is not a doctor but a politician.”
Actually more like a prostitute, but I repeat myself.
It is highly risky for everyone.
The notion that “at risk” folks should take a dangerous vaccine is....
absurd.
Wonder how much they get paid or/and discounts for each coof vax.
Not here to debate, Jane Long is a great FReeper, she asked me a question, I answered it.
Believe what you want to. I’m not here to change your mind.
I quote Pfizer's publication of the pivotal trial (NEJM Polack Dec 2020): "This report does not address the prevention of Covid-19 in other populations, such as younger adolescents, children, and pregnant women. Safety and immune response data from this trial after immunization of adolescents 12 to 15 years of age will be reported subsequently, and additional studies are planned to evaluate BNT162b2 in pregnant women, children younger than 12 years, and those in special risk groups, such as immunocompromised persons."
The subsequent studies done by Pfizer for pregnant women and children were sh*t.
For pregnant women, Pfizer promised a randomized study with 4,000 women. See Pfizer press release of February 18, 2021. Pfizer delivered a study with just 320 women. Data from the 320 found that vaccination was associated with a dramatic increase in "congenital malformations" (6% vaccine arm/3.6% placebo arm). Given that mothers in the study were NOT vaccinated before 24 weeks, any vaccine associated increase in congenital malformation is of concern. I am left to ask "what would the malformation numbers be if we vaccinate mothers at 8 weeks gestation"?
Unfortunately, Pfizer's unexplained decision to reduce the study population from promised 4,000 to 320 (a 92% reduction) leaves me with broad overlap in the confidence interval for congenital malformation results. I cannot tell you if the dramatic increase in vaccine hazard ratio is due to the vaccine or just bad luck.
Plan to Share IPD: Yes Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. END QUOTE
Pfizer's promise to share data was unchanged through 14 NCT changes over one year. On February 17, 2022, suddenly and without explanation, Pfizer changed their "Plan to Share IPD" to "No." I wonder why.
But wait, there's more disappointment.
Previous Pfizer trial endpoints examined symptomatic infection confirmed by PCR done in Pfizer's Pearl River, NY lab. Quoting Polack's NEJM "limitations" from the pivotal trial: "These data do not address whether vaccination prevents asymptomatic infection." The lack of RANDOMIZED, placebo controlled data about asymptomatic infection represents a sizable knowledge gap in a disease known to have a 40% asymptomatic rate (higher rate in young, healthy populations).
Uniquely, the Pfizer pregnancy study promised a RANDOMIZED, placebo controlled, blinded study of vaccine efficacy against asymptomatic infection.
Pfizer is not now reporting results for this asymptomatic endpoint. Pfizer promises to do so in July 2024. This study started in February 2021. How can it take three and one half years to provide blood work on 320 women?
Pfizer provides a "dog ate my homework/we are too busy" excuse.
The pivotal Pfizer trial was 100 times larger than this pregnancy trial and they got the serology work done on time. This current reporting delay is BS. Pfizer got bad vaccine efficacy numbers and they want to play hide the ball. Pfizer needs three and one half years to do the blood work on 320 women? Absurd.
Where is ACOG? Does ACOG endorse Pfizer's unilateral decision to decrease the study population here by 92%? Does ACOG think Pfizer should be allowed to hide data? Does ACOG think it should take 3 and one half years to do bloodwork? Will ACOG call for a RANDOMIZED trial that studies vaccination at the first prenatal visit? (8-10 weeks)?
The EXCESS death rate in Australia is currently running at over 20,000 people per year (despite the ABS altering the baseline), for a population of 26m.
And nobody is allowed to investigate.
And nobody is allowed to say anything.
Just take your Vioxx.https://t.co/a3UPgg7eNR pic.twitter.com/j5EZr759y2— Jikkyleaks 🐭 (@Jikkyleaks) September 9, 2023
So it gets worse. Your post details, among other frauds and deceptions, how congenital defects rose dramatically with Pfizer compared with the placebo group that turns out to be a fake placebo group. Pfizer's so-called placebo group was vaccinated with Moderna.Science Fraud: Pfizer’s Covid Jab “Placebo” Control Group Was Given Moderna’s “Vaccine”
Liberty Daily ^ | 9/8/23 | Mac Slavo
Posted on 9/9/2023, 1:22:57 AM by CFW
Pfizer has committed a major scientific fraud. Instead of giving a control group a placebo, they were instead given Moderna’s mRNA “vaccine.” The problem is, that’s no longer a control group, and the data was presented as if they were given a placebo or a “treatment that has no therapeutic valuce, such as water, or saline.”
New research published at Preprints.org reveals that the so-called “placebo” injections used in Pfizer’s Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) “vaccine” trials were not real placebos. Moderna’s “vaccine” has some kind of effect on the body, or the ruling class wouldn’t insist the slaves be injected with it.
[snip]
“On December 23, 2020, the subject received Dose 1 of the Moderna mRNA … died on January 11, 2021,” the preprint explains. The subject in question was a 65-year-old Hispanic male with a medical history that included pulmonary fibrosis and hypertension. Thanks to immunosuppression from the Moderna jabs, the man died rather quickly – and Pfizer-BioNTech officially classified him as an “unvaccinated” COVID death.
(Excerpt) Read more at thelibertydaily.com ...
My doc knows the exact amount his practice (and, others) made/would have made with the well-known $hot promotion program. Interesting that you don’t have access to that info, for your *practice*.
Also....if the $hots do such good, and, are free....why isn’t insulin free? Or, chemotherapy?? Epipens?
(h/t Kevin Sorbo)
All part of The Plan™
😡
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.