Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

1789: Thomas Phipps the elder and Thomas Phipps the younger
ExecutedToday.com ^ | September 5th, 2015 | Meaghan Good

Posted on 09/06/2023 9:00:33 PM PDT by CheshireTheCat

These malefactors were father and son; and their final exit from this life was attended by circumstances of the most heart-rending and melancholy description.

The father was a man of good property, and lived on his own estate at Llwyney Mapsis, in Shropshire; and he and his son were indicted for uttering a note of hand for twenty pounds, purporting to be that of Mr. Richard Coleman of Oswestry, knowing the same to have been forged.

It was proved on their trial that Mr. Coleman never had had any transactions with Mr. Phipps that required the signing of any note whatever; that about the Christmas before, Mr. Coleman was served with a copy of a writ at the suit of Mr. Phipps the elder, which action Mr. Coleman defended, and for want of further proceedings on the part of the plaintiff, a non pros. was signed, with two pounds three shillings costs of suit against Phipps.

Upon this an affidavit was drawn up and sworn by Phipps the elder, Phipps the younger, and William Thomas, their clerk, for the purpose of moving the Court of Exchequer to set aside the judgment of non pros. and therein they swore that the cause of action was a note of the said Coleman’s for twenty pounds, which was given as satisfaction for a trespass by him committed in carrying some hay off the land of one of Mr. Phipps the elder’s tenants......

(Excerpt) Read more at executedtoday.com ...


TOPICS: History
KEYWORDS: blogkarensnotwelcome; dontlikedontclick
I missed yesterday's posting. Been very busy with getting house stuff done. Winter is coming.
1 posted on 09/06/2023 9:00:33 PM PDT by CheshireTheCat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CheshireTheCat

Severe. I wonder how they proved forgery?


2 posted on 09/06/2023 9:33:34 PM PDT by Theophilus (It's far easier to rig a jury than an election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CheshireTheCat

Wow, and we think “justice” dished out by the Saudis is harsh.

A definite case of “honesty is the best policy”!


3 posted on 09/06/2023 9:52:22 PM PDT by Paul R. (You know your pullets are dumb if they don't recognize a half Whopper as food!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CheshireTheCat

Doing genealogical research I discovered a relative from Pennsylvania who was convicted of ‘Obscene Libel’ in 1861. He was fined 1 dollar and 30 days in jail.

Seriously? When is the last time anybody was ever convicted of obscene libel lately? The courts would be swamped. (Being ‘obscene’ I would assume that he used some cuss words when uttering his libel.)

The poor fellow ended up dead in Maryland in January of 1862 while fighting for the Union in the Civil War... It doesn’t say how he died it just says ‘died’, but maybe he obscenely libeled the wrong person.


4 posted on 09/07/2023 4:07:18 AM PDT by jerod (Nazi's were essentially Socialist in Hugo Boss uniforms... Get over it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CheshireTheCat

bkmk


5 posted on 09/07/2023 4:15:09 AM PDT by sauropod (I will stand for truth even if I stand alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson