3 Reasons There’s Something Sinister With the Big Push for Electric Vehicles

25 refrigerators. That’s how much the additional electricity consumption per household would be if the average US home adopted electric vehicles (EVs).

Congressman Thomas Massie—an electrical engineer—revealed this information while discussing with Pete Buttigieg, the Secretary of Transportation, President Biden’s plan to have 50% of cars sold in the US be electric by 2030.

The current and future grid in most places will not be able to support each home running 25 refrigerators—not even close. Just look at California, where the grid is already buckling under the existing load.

Massie claims, correctly, in my view, that the notion of widespread adoption of electric vehicles anytime soon is a dangerous fantasy based on political science, not sound engineering.

Nonetheless, governments, the media, academia, large corporations, and celebrities tout an imminent “transition” to EVs as if it’s preordained from above. It’s not.

They’re trying to manufacture your consent for a scam of almost unimaginable proportions.

Below are three reasons why something sinister is going on with the big push for EVs. But first, a necessary clarification. You no doubt have heard of the term “fossil fuels” before.

When the average person hears “fossil fuels,” they think of a dirty technology that belongs in the 1800s. Many believe they are burning dead dinosaurs to power their cars.

They also think “fossil fuels” will destroy the planet within a decade and run out soon—despite the fact that, after water, oil is the second most abundant liquid on this planet.

None of these ridiculous notions are true, but many people believe them. Using propaganda terms like “fossil fuels” plays a large role.

Orwell was correct when he said that corrupting the language can corrupt people’s thoughts. I suggest expunging “fossil fuels” from your vocabulary in favor of hydrocarbons—a much better and more precise word.

A hydrocarbon is a molecule made up of carbon and hydrogen atoms. These molecules are the building blocks of many different substances, including energy sources like coal, oil, and gas. These energy sources have been the backbone of the global economy for decades, providing power for industries, transportation, and homes. Now, on to the three reasons EVs are a giant scam at best and possibly something much worse.

The central premise for EVs is they help to save the planet from carbon because they use electricity instead of gas. It’s astounding so few think to ask, what generates the electricity that powers EVs?

Hydrocarbons generate over 60% of the electricity in the US. That means there’s an excellent chance that oil, coal, or gas is behind the electricity charging an EV.

It’s important to emphasize carbon is an essential element for life on this planet. It’s what humans exhale and what plants need to survive.

After decades of propaganda, Malthusian hysterics have created a twisted perception in many people’s minds that carbon is a dangerous substance that must be reduced to save the planet.

Let’s entertain this bogus premise momentarily and assume carbon is bad. Even by this logic, EVs do not really reduce carbon emissions; they just rearrange them. Further, extracting and processing the exotic materials needed to make EVs requires tremendous power in remote locations, which only hydrocarbons can provide.

Additionally, EVs require an enormous amount of rare elements and metals—like lithium and cobalt—that companies mine in conditions that couldn’t remotely be considered friendly to the environment.

Analysts estimate that each EV requires around one kilogram of rare earth elements. Extracting and processing these rare elements produces a massive amount of toxic waste. That’s why it mainly occurs in China, which doesn’t care much about environmental concerns.

In short, the notion that EVs are green is laughable. It’s simply the thin patina of propaganda that governments need as a pretext to justify the astronomical taxpayer subsidies for EVs.

For many years, governments have heavily subsidized EVs through rebates, sales tax exemptions, loans, grants, tax credits, and other means.

According to the Wall Street Journal, US taxpayers will subsidize EVs by at least $393 billion in the coming years—more than the GDP of Hong Kong.

To put that in perspective, if you earned $1 a second 24/7/365—about $31 million per year—it would take you over 12,677 YEARS to make $393 billion. And that’s not even considering the immense subsidies and government support that have occurred in the past.

Furthermore, governments impose burdensome regulations and taxes on gasoline vehicles to make EVs seem relatively more attractive. Even with this enormous government support, EVs can barely compete with gasoline vehicles.

According to J.D. Power, a consumer research firm, the average EV still costs at least 21% more than the average gasoline vehicle. Without government support, it’s not hard to see how the market for EVs would evaporate as they would become unaffordable for the vast majority of people.

In other words, the EV market is a giant mirage artificially propped up by extensive government intervention.

It begs the question, why are governments going all out to push an obviously uneconomic scam? While they are undoubtedly corrupt thieves and simply stupid, something more nefarious could also be at play.

EVs are spying machines. They collect an unimaginable amount of data on you, which governments can access easily. Analysts estimate that cars generate about 25 gigabytes of data every hour.

Seeing how governments could integrate EVs into a larger high-tech control grid doesn’t take much imagination. The potential for busybodies—or worse—to abuse such a system is obvious.

Consider this. The last thing any government wants is an incident like what happened with the Canadian truckers rebelling against vaccine mandates. Had the Canadian truckers’ vehicles been EVs, the government would have been able to stamp out the resistance much easier.

Here’s the bottom line. The people really in charge do not want the average person to have genuine freedom of movement or access to independent power sources.

They want to know everything, keep you dependent, and have the ability to control everything, just like how a farmer would with his cattle. They think of you in similar terms. That’s why gasoline vehicles have to go and why they are trying to herd us into EVs.

Conclusion To summarize, EVs are not green, cannot compete with gas cars without enormous government support, and are probably a crucial piece of the emerging high-tech control grid.

The solution is simple: eliminate all government subsidies and support and let EVs compete on their own merits in a totally free market. But that’s unlikely to happen. Instead, it’s only prudent to expect them to push EVs harder and harder.

If EVs were simply government-subsidized status symbols for wealthy liberals who want to virtue signal how they think they’re saving the planet, that would be bad enough. But chances are, the big push for EVs represents something much worse.

Along with 15-minute cities, carbon credits, CBDCs, digital IDs, phasing out hydrocarbons and meat, vaccine passports, an ESG social credit system, and the war on farmers, EVs are likely an integral part of the Great Reset—the dystopian future the global elite has envisioned for mankind.

In reality, the so-called Great Reset is a high-tech form of feudalism. Sadly, most of humanity has no idea what is coming.

Worse, many have become unwitting foot soldiers for this agenda because they have been gaslighted into believing they are saving the planet or acting for the greater good. This trend is already in motion… and the coming weeks will be pivotal.

That’s precisely why I just released an urgent report on where this is all headed and what you can do about it… including three strategies everyone needs today. Click here to download the PDF now.

https://internationalman.com/special-report/the-most-dangerous-economic-crisis-in-100-years-the-top-3-strategies-you-need-right-now/

Blaming “climate change” on atmospheric CO2 levels is like blaming a band-aid for the cut it covers.
The atmosphere converts climate into weather, period.
Other than that, the atmosphere plays no part in climate. Nor does any (trace) gas in the atmosphere.

“Climate is what you expect. Weather is what you get.” - Lazarus Long (Robert Heinlein)....................

Red Badger :" In reality, the so-called Great Reset is a high-tech form of feudalism.
Sadly, most of humanity has no idea what is coming."

Truest statement ever made about the WEF's plan of the "Great Reset" and the UN's Project 2030.
A division of the world population into 'Lords versus serfs' and controlled by the 'self-entitled' and 'un-elected'.
The term "Fossil Fuels" is the excuse to create the division.
An example of their aloofness is John Kerry

"Imagine being at the mercy of a corrupt government who forecasts blackouts"

Imagine the summer smell of a neighborhood unable to run refrigerators due to unreliable power.

Besides being wildly impractical for many, how many people can even afford one? Buying a used one & not having a way of knowing the condition of many parts on it seems pretty absurd. The used one would probably cost more than most people could afford anyway. The electrical grid is hardly up to the task of what we need right now, let alone a few years down the road. From what I have heard, EV dealers would have to put up quite a bit of money to be able to sell & provide service facilities for them. Some dealers are already going out of business rather than to be able to afford sales & service for them. They are just a really,really bad idea. Want to drive something the government could easily control? Get an EV.

A wise man once said, “The only way to defeat a Liberal is to give them everything they want.”...................

Yes. Problem is, they don't go over the cliff alone. They drag us all with them.

“And the tires they require are not your ordinary tire”

Huh?

I have a S60 Volvo and a Model 3 Tesla both are on 235/45R18s and they both happen to be on Pirelli and they absolutely are the identical tires same load rating same speed rating same tire id they numbers. The Model 3 is actually 100lbs lighter in curb weight vs the S60 and both are within one inch of each other is footprint shadow based on length and width so the identical exterior size. The Larger Model S still uses regular V or Z rated sedan tires one of my lawyers has a S plaid and it is not much heavier than the 7 series BMW it replaced with similar 20 inch tires on both.

The tire issue is for EV winter driving. There are snow tires specifically made for EV winter driving. I doubt many people swap out for snow tires unless they have to be prepared for driving in snowy conditions. I have an ICE car and wait until the roads are mostly clear before driving.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.