Posted on 07/31/2023 5:57:23 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Media finally covering rise in heart problems, but blames it on Covid virus and ignores role of experimental jabs
The propaganda machine is going to have to work overtime to hide the crisis ahead
A recent study. revealing young Americans have seen a 30% increase in heart attack deaths since the spring of 2020 is puzzling mainstream media pundits who must have forgotten about the experimental Covid jabs forced onto the world right at that exact same time.
NBC’s the Today show reported, “A national study from Cedars Sinai hospital shows the deaths related to heart attacks increased across every age group since the spring of 2020, but the group that saw the biggest increase isn’t who you might think… The relative increase in heart attack-associated deaths among 25-44-year-olds was a staggering 30%… Experts are still working to figure out why young people are so impacted.”
An expert interviewed in the news report expressed concern the Covid virus itself may be harming people’s cardiovascular systems and increasing the likelihood of blood clot formation.
The report also explained studies have connected Covid-19 with myocarditis, obviously ignoring the massive links between the Covid jabs and heart inflammation.
A person cited in the report even claimed the Covid virus itself is much more likely to give someone myocarditis than the experimental shot.
NBC Senior Medical Correspondent Dr. John Torres was brought on the program to counter those who think the Covid “vaccines” are behind the sharp rise in heart problems.
When NBC anchors asked Dr. Torres if he had advice for young people who have had Covid and may be afraid of experiencing a heart issue, the Big Pharma shill laughably suggested they get a Covid vaccine and...
(Excerpt) Read more at infowars.com ...
They know.
They are just pretending to not know.
It is the fake vax and the date in this article could simply be manipulation to make people believe it isn’t what it really is.
It is the clot shots and all the pretending to be shocked is plain old acting.
Hosea 4:6
.
It said Spring 2020——
“It said Spring 2020——”
Yes! That was even before Trump announced Operation Warp Speed.
Thus, since the fax didn’t exist it could not be responsible.
The FDA granted emergency use authorization to the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccine on December 10, 2020. If the rise in heart attacks began in spring of 2020 it was not caused by the Covid vaccines.
“A snarky pejorative intimating your “logical” conclusions are perfectly correct — which we know are conclusively inaccurate given the documented deaths and injuries related to the vaxx.”
Cite my post and show me incorrect. You can’t so to won’t
Good grief, will you two just get it over with and screw? The sexual tension is off the charts.
You seem to be obsessed with sex.
I’ve noticed that trait in a certain protected class.
You formed an opinion shrouded in the appearance of “truthful logic” — an opinion that appears to rule out the possibility of the vaxx contributing to death and injuries.
You could have made a similar argument that the pre-vaxx deaths were due to anxiety, other stresses, or simply the result of population growth or non-trending anomalies. The reported increase of 30% over the stipulated 4 years is, however, clearly not an anomaly and appears to be more of a trend. Furthermore, the COVID-19 case-fatality for that age demo was around 0.02% which is quite a distance from the reported Heart Attack stats of 30%.
As far as I’m concerned, the only logical conclusion that can be made based on the scant details provided in the article, is that no accurate conclusion can be formed based on the 3 significant but broad factors alone.
“Whatever could it be?”
Your linked study says COVID related.
“As far as I’m concerned, the only logical conclusion that can be made based on the scant details provided in the article, is that no accurate conclusion can be formed based on the 3 significant but broad factors alone.”
The linked study says it is COVID and we know it wasn’t the vax since the fax didn’t exist in 2020.
Vaccination status should provide a clue.
As for timing, I don’t remember the timing of events. Different sources, remember it differently.
The vaccine was passed off as just another vaccine, safe and effective. It’s clear the mRNA “vaccine” was not just another vaccine. People were misled. The technology is different - it is different. It was not a traditional vaccine. It was an experimental vaccine. It was that was not fully tested prior to release. How could anyone say that an experimental vaccine, not fully tested, is safe and effective? There was no informed consent. That is damning.
“Cause Unknown” The epidemic of Sudden Deaths in 2021 and 2022, by Edward Dowd is a good book. I’m only halfway through it as the topic is so depressing.
HCQ and Ivermectin were fully tested in their day, unlike the mRNA shots.
Our problems in this matter are due to the entry of politics into medicine. We are all smart enough to see what we see, argue about it, and make things better from the arguments. They're rarely personal.
“The FDA granted emergency use authorization to the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccine on December 10, 2020. If the rise in heart attacks began in spring of 2020 it was not caused by the Covid vaccines.”
InfoWars recycles an old study that says it was COVID related and puts out fake click-baid to excite the conspiracists.
I am so fed up with your mindless trolling. Did you read the first sentence?
"Media finally covering rise in heart problems, but blames it on Covid virus and ignores role of experimental jabs"
Please have me banned so I never get trolled by you again.
You mean the one your mom’s in?
Did you miss the part where the case-fatality for that age demo was 0.02% as reported by Johns Hopkins and the CDC for the duration of 2020? Do you not think the CDC, Fauci, the MSM, and Pharma would have flaunted that 30% rise in heart attacks among 25-44 YOs?
Every year I accidentally would get a few 15ml doses of Ivermectin, and five way shots for rabies, clostridium, hoof rot, tetanus, jabbed into my hands along with an apology from my girls. I asked my vet the first time. He said it was not a worry. The Ivermectin is formulated for swine use, and Pigs are extremely close to humans in physiological aspects.
That's the problem here, TeslaGator.
It's too basic.
Is it possible that the increase of heart/circulatory problems prior to the poison is purely coincidental? Your basic logic can't and doesn't account for that and it seems to me your logic infers Covid itself is the reason for the increase.
If this is what you postulate, your basic logic fails to account for those who didn't contract covid, yet were injected with the poison, and then suffered heart/circulatory problems.
Certainly, it's possible that two instances are at work here - a coincidental increase and an increase due to the poison.
Time and more thorough studies will tell, but it's certain us keyboard warriors don't yet know the truth. My money is on the poison being the cause as outlined in actuarial tables and European countries' excess mortality in relation to the number of those injected with the poison.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.