The Politics of Inertia

American Greatness ^ | 27 May 2023 | Roger Kimball

[Rummyfan]

The blind trajectory set by Joe Biden’s autopilot just barreled on through, unhindered.

Has something finally intervened to change the 2024 calculus?>p>

“Inertia” is an interesting word. It comes from the Latin iners, which means, first of all, “without skill,” “incompetent” (in, not + ars, art, skill). But it also means “sluggish,” “weak,” “inactive,” “motionless.” In common speech, “inertia” generally suggests something torpid, sleepy, without spunk or initiative. “Joe wanted to go to the race but was overcome by inertia and stayed home.”

But there is another, more potent sense of “inertia” in common usage. It is implicit in the definition Newton gives in his first law of motion. Corpus omne perseverare in statu suo quiescendi vel movendi uniformiter in directum, nisi quatenus a viribus impressis cogitur statum illum mutare. “Every body preserves its state of rest or uniform movement in a straight line unless forced to change that state by forces impressed upon it.”

...

Consider the Biden Administration. Once achieved, it lumbered on. Joe Biden’s incontinent glossolalia didn’t matter, nor did his signal failure at the southern border, with energy policy, or with the economy. The communicable mind-virus of wokeness may have reached epidemic proportions in the corporate world, in government agencies, even in the U.S. military, but the blind trajectory set by Biden’s autopilot just barreled on through, unhindered.

Has something finally intervened to change things? Maybe. In substance, it is just the same thing we’ve seen many times before: allegations about Joe Biden’s involvement with his son Hunter’s shady business dealing. Tucker Carlson, among others, detailed these allegations in technicolor. Back in October 2020—note the date—Carlson interviewed Hunter Biden’s former business partner Tony Bobulinski. It was an extraordinary, and extraordinarily damaging, interview.

[Rummyfan]

Or so one would have thought. As I noted at the time, Bobulinski “laid out the entire bizarre story of his association with the Bidens, including two face-to-face meetings with Joe Biden in the company of his brother and son.”

...

The outcome or upshot? The press seized on the revelations and overnight it became the media sensation of the election season.

Just kidding! Some commentators attacked Bobulinski as a Russian agent. Mostly, however, the story was studiously ignored where it was not actively buried. A day or two after Tucker Carlson’s blockbuster interview, a search for “Bobulinski” on the CNN site produced a search-not-found result. It still does. How odd.

[chajin]

Joe Biden’s incontinent glossolalia didn’t matter

It hadn't occurred to me that he might be a charismatic Catholic, but miracles never cease...

[TChad]

a search for “Bobulinski” on the CNN site produced a search-not-found result. It still does. How odd.

Yes.

A search for “Bobulinski” on Wikipedia now redirects to "Biden–Ukraine conspiracy theory":

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biden%E2%80%93Ukraine_conspiracy_theory

There is no Wiki article on Tony Bobulinski.