Posted on 05/08/2023 3:16:01 PM PDT by CFW
Donald Trump rape accuser E. Jean Carroll has a bizarre Facebook post history that sheds light on some of her more personal thoughts and questions. Much of her commentary appears obsessed with sex, violence, and pornography, with one post from 2012 discussing sex with Donald Trump in a jovial fashion.
Carroll, 79, first alleged that she was raped by Trump in a book released in 2019. Her story is extremely similar to the sub plot of a Law and Order episode which aired in late 2012, a few months after she posted a sex question about Trump to her Facebook followers. Carroll has admitted to being both a Law and Order and an Apprentice fan, the latter hosted by Trump for almost two decades.
“Would you have sex with Donald Trump for $17,000?” she asked her followers, before going on to suggest that in her fantasy scenario, Trump may not be able to speak.
(Excerpt) Read more at thenationalpulse.com ...
Just another typical decrepit libtard
Sad.
A jury of one’s political enemies is not a jury of one’s peers.
Will any of the jurors know anything about this? I can imagine the judge essentially telling them to find in favor of E. Jean Carroll.
The prosecution will try to prevent all that from being presented as ‘irrelevant to the case’. The judge will very likely comply.
I keep asking if all this was brought out at the trial.
The “news” media just want to be able to say rapist Trump
From the article: “Trump’s defense lawyer Joseph Tacopina is believed to have shown the jury the unearthed Facebook post from August 2012.”
What the heck? “Believed” to have shown the jury? He either did or he didn’t.
Bill Clinton made this kind of trash acceptable to the left. May he burn in hell.
See how Big Media's bias affects peoples' perception of the truth?
I guarantee you, the jury will not convict Donald Trump of anything.
This is, you see, not a rape trial. In fact, it is not a criminal trial at all.
It s a civil trial, regarding alleged defamation.
1) In a book, this Carroll creature accused Trump of rape.
2) Trump denied the accusation and called Carroll a liar.
3) Carroll considers being called a liar to be defamation, and sued Trump, resulting in the current civil court trial.
The jury has the power to find Trump liable for defamation, by a preponderance of the evidence, and enter a monetary judgment against him. Or not.
Jury is 6 men and 3 women. NYC...I bet they are ALL DEms.
“This is, you see, not a rape trial. In fact, it is not a criminal trial at all.”
I realize that. You are correct. I should have said they will find him responsible for defaming her by denying her rape claim and calling her out for the ugly crazy __itch she is for making up the rape accusations.
But, to the jury, it will be the closest they can come to finding him guilty of rape so they will take it.
I agree. This, and the Stormy Daniels case, are both absolute chickenshit.
“Believe all wimmen”
Manhattan jury = guilty on all charges
She never had sex after that...doesn't make sense...wonder if she had any after her second divorce.
Didn't write it in her diary because she didn't want to be reminded...but spent $13,000 in Bergdorfs over the next few years. Wonder if she bought anything in THAT department.
Her girlfriends...why call 2?? Doesn't make sense...but looks good in court.
If that stuff is ruled “irrelevant” that has to a good basis for appeal. It absolutely is as relevant as any of the crazy witch’s “evidence” allowed during the trial. Unbelievable.
I’m unfortunately of the belief that they jury will convict based upon how many things he has seemingly escaped so for, plus it’s a civil trial so unanimity is not required. “He’s gotta be guilty of something”. 90+% of leftists feel this way and they’re bound and determined to wreck Trump’s life.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.