Posted on 04/24/2023 6:59:26 AM PDT by JonPreston
Ukraine & the Globalist War Mongers - Col Doug Macgregor - 28min video
100%
Scott Ritter: Ukrainian spring offensive - will it happen? It seems that the long-awaited and widely publicized Ukrainian spring offensive will not take place after all. At least that's what Ukrainian officials say, saying they haven't received…
pic.twitter.com/BrtWL5JTwh— Zlatti71 (@djuric_zlatko) April 24, 2023
ROTFLOL!
Andrew Napolitano and Douglas Macgregor teaming up makes me think of Catwoman and The Penguin joining forces!
Your response is to throw out two predictions by Scott Ritter?
Ok, let’s document these and revisit them.
First SR prediction: “Ukrainian spring offensive - will it happen? The answer is rather negative. It seems that the long-awaited and widely publicized Ukrainian spring offensive will not take place after all.”
Second SR prediction:
“This war will end sometime this summer or early fall and end with a decisive defeat for Ukraine.”
How has Scott Ritter’s predictive powers fared in past? If we go all the way back to November 15, 2022 we’ll find this gem: “Well, the short answer is Ukraine’s going to have to accept reality. It has permanently lost Kherson”
Tell me, JonPreston, did Russia retreat from Kherson after Ritter made his prediction? Did you notice? Did it in anyway affect your opinion of his assessments, analysis and predictive powers?
See you tomorrow 🤡🤣👍
Your analysis is as bad as MacGregor’s.
No anger whatsoever. Just confusion that you would continue to seek the opinions and predictions of someone so demonstrably bad at analysis and prediction in this war.
Angry at you? No, embarrassed for you is closer to the mark. But I guess you’re just trolling. It would explain the lies and your hope(?) that you’ve made me angry.
Will you dodge these questions tomorrow too? As you keep dodging the list grows.
1. What does he say that is correct instead of what you want to hear?
2. Have any of his predictions come to pass?
3. Why would you keep sharing what someone who is so demonstrably wrong about what has come to pass has to say? What is the point?
4. Didn’t the Russians retreat from Kherson after Ritter made his prediction? Did you notice? Did it in anyway affect your opinion of his assessments, analysis and predictive powers?
I can see you're confused.
Come by tomorrow for another tutorial.
Who wouldn’t be confused watching someone follow and repost wrong predictions for over a year?
What did you think when Ritter said Russia wouldn’t leave Kherson and the Ukrainians kicked them out? Did it make you angry? Or confused?
In the Bloggers & Personal forum, on a thread titled Ukraine & the Globalist War Mongers - Col Doug Macgregor, Gunslingr3 wrote: Your response is to throw out two predictions by Scott Ritter?
Ok, let’s document these and revisit them.First SR prediction: “Ukrainian spring offensive - will it happen? The answer is rather negative. It seems that the long-awaited and widely publicized Ukrainian spring offensive will not take place after all.”
Second SR prediction:
“This war will end sometime this summer or early fall and end with a decisive defeat for Ukraine.”How has Scott Ritter’s predictive powers fared in past? If we go all the way back to November 15, 2022 we’ll find this gem: “Well, the short answer is Ukraine’s going to have to accept reality. It has permanently lost Kherson”
Tell me, JonPreston, did Russia retreat from Kherson after Ritter made his prediction? Did you notice? Did it in anyway affect your opinion of his assessments, analysis and predictive powers?
Such predictions were made by many skilled military analysts in the mistaken belief that Zelensky would want Ukrainian soldiers and the Ukrainian infrastructure to survive in order to rebuild living conditions in the Ukraine.
But this is NATO's proxy war, and NATO fully intends to leave the Ukraine, and its soldiers, in piles of ashes in order to achieve it's goal of regime change in Russia. Zelensky is fine stripping the region of every male over the age of 14.
That's the big problem with the military analysis - they didn't know Zelensky et. al. would sacrifice every last man, woman and child in addition to all operable infrastructure- they kept thinking he wanted to protect living conditions etc.
MacGregor later realized that this is NATO's proxy war, that all of the war fighting going on by soldiers is lead by the combined NATO command structure, and he adapted his analysis to that reality.
MacGregor has been saying for months now, that this is NATO's war, and the recent destruction of 300 NATO alliance staff in an underground bunker proves MacGregor is correct. Even a mainstream media outlet recently admitted it's NATO's proxy war.
MacGregor has always been correct about the uselessness of sending unprotected tanks to the Ukraine, he's been right about the vast disparity in ammunition, with the Russians having about an 8 to 1 advantage and hence MacGregor has been right that the Ukrainians and our MSM have been vastly under reporting their casualties and vastly over reporting those of Russia. MacGregor is a gold mine of tactical and strategic information which is correct.
Most importantly, MacGregor has been right that the Ukraine will absolutely lose this war. All your propagandists have been lying and hiding the Ukrainian losses and deficits. Even when I quoted The Economist's interview with the top military official stating that he knew he couldn ot get the hardware he needed to win because NATO didn't have it to give him, you and your kind kept insisting Russia is helpless and losing. MacGregor has been right about 50 times more often than your key propagandist, the Ukrainian military's mouthpiece, Denys Davydov.
MacGregor is a decorated military veteran and someone whom President Trump trusted and appointed to positions. Your Ukrainian pilot is just a shill like you - he has nothing to compare to MacGregor's combat experience, particularly in tank divisions.
Macgregor on Feb 27, 2022
“Now the battle in Eastern Ukraine is almost over, the Ukrainian troops are largely surrounded and cut off....if they don’t vend, surrender the next 24 hours, the Russians will ultimately annihilate them”.
Then on March 6, 2022
“I would say another 10 days this should be completely over”
March 16, 2022
“”The war is really over for the Ukrainians”, “They have been grounded to bits. There’s no question about that”
September 12, 2022
“this war may soon end,” and added: “The Ukrainian army is bled, tens of thousands of Ukrainian soldiers are killed or wounded, Ukraine is really in the balance.”
This was the day after the liberation of Izium, Balakleia and Kupiansk - and before the Ukrainian army liberated Kherson.
==========/
Only brain dead snowflakes who support Putin would still believe MacDaddy
The war is Putin’s war - which you are supporting, IvanPresto.
This ain’t paedoBidon’s —> he took out American advisors before Feb 2022 and tried to get the figurehead Zelenskyy out and let Putin take over Ukraine.
Brandon was only forced into this because the Ukrainians fought and won against Putin’s invading army in Feb and March - the Ukrainians won the battle of Hostomel and the battle for Kyiv
Perhaps you should be asking why your USSR was the one that invaded its allies - Czechoslovakia in 1956 and Hungary shortly after.
NO wonder the Czechs, Poles, Slovaks, Hungarians etc. quickly ran to join NATO - to stymie any future Muscowite imperialist ambitions
Feb 27, 2022 “Now the battle in Eastern Ukraine is almost over, the Ukrainian troops are largely surrounded and cut off, now they have a concentration down in the southeast in 30 to 40 thousand , and if they don't vend, surrender the next 24 hours, the Russians will ultimately annihilate them”,
March 2022 "The battle in eastern Ukraine is really almost over, all of the Ukrainian troops there have been largely surrounded and cut off. You have a concentration down in the Southeast of 30 or 40,000 of them, and if they don't surrender in the next 24 hours, I suspect Russia will ultimately annihilate them."
July 2022 about HIMARS: It will have no effect on the current situation. Our administration does not want to admit that these military actions are long lost.
I haven′t found a single statement by MacGregor about Ukraine war that didn’t turn out flat out wrong or worse shortly thereafter. It’s not really a question why MacGregor says the things he does, he’s either delusional or on the Kremlin’s payroll (or both). The real question is why would anyone still pay attention to what he’s saying? His credibility was shredded within the first 14 days of the invasion
oh and MacGRegies Feb 2023 claim "We just don't have ammunition to send. We have reached the limit; our own reserves are rapidly coming to an end." -- In reality, for most categories of ammunition, the U.S. can provide support to Ukraine indefinitely. Only for two types of ammunition -- 155 mm artillery ammunition, which includes a wide variety of non-precision projectiles, and 155 mm Excalibur GPS-guided precision artillery shells -- the United States may have a shortage in the coming years if it doesn’t replenish.
However, the U.S. has already moved to increase munitions production to avoid shortages
MacDaddy shows he is a Kremlin puppet every time he opens his mouth.
Any unbiased reading of history shows that the governments of Czechoslovakia and Hungary waved in the Soviets as a result of CIA instigated, color revolutions. But what would the Polish know? They are a insignificant nation, filled with slow learners.
Oh Ivanpresto, you have outed yourself now.
Claiming that the Soviet invasions of Czechoslovakia in 1968 and Hungary in 1956 were “the governments of Czechoslovakia and Hungary waved in the Soviets as a result of CIA instigated, color revolutions”
Is that what your Soviet history books taught you?
Does the thought of CIA meddling in world affairs run counter to Polish Programming? It’s no wonder the world laughs at you.
Ha ha, you guys in St. Petersburg really are taught that the CIA was behind the Hungarian attempt to throw off communism in 1956!!
And I guess you think that the Soviets “liberated” Hungary in 1956, eh?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.