Posted on 03/24/2023 6:18:15 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
#ing Rats
Hard to disagree with what Gaetz said
“Hard to disagree with what Gaetz said”
Is it one or the other? Does he have to let the Leftists RUN FREE on our kids until (and unless) he’s able to kill the Dept. of ‘Education’?
Question: Why would Matt Gaetz vote against something like this?
Possible Answer: Because Speaker of the House McCarthy was for it, and Matt still has a (mysterious) bone to pick with Kevin. Matt is still not beyond throwing a road block in front of the Speaker, just for spite.
This may have something to do with a few months back, when Matt Gaetz was being accused of Sex Trafficking a 17 y/o girl. Perhaps Matt thinks the GOP did not fight for him very hard, left him hanging out to dry.
>> Gaetz: I don’t want to strengthen the federal Department of Education. I want to abolish it.
When every Rat votes against, unlikely the DoE is being strengthened. And doubtful this measure would any further preclude the elimination of the DoE.
Interesting.
I can’t say I understand the issue, or even intend to research it.😉
That being said. I get an uncomfortable vibe fro Matt Gaetz.
My .02
I sorta agree with Gaetz on this issue. Once government official are empowered with granting the people a right, then they can also take that right away. Rights of parents should be inherent and endowed upon people by their very existence and the fact that they are the parents of their own children. Unless a parent is causing a known harm to their child and violating a state law, then the federal government has no right to interfere. Parents should be allowed to educate their child as they see fit and to have control of the educational doctrine of their local school system.
There should be no “rights” given by government and passed by laws as to a parent’s rights to have a say-so in their child’s education. It should be a given. I assure you that if such a law is passed, the left will use it to impose certain requirements on parents as to what subject matter their children should be required to learn, including requiring home-schooled children to be indoctrinated in the current LGIBLET choices. That the government giveth, it can also take away.
Gaetz is equivocating.
You can’t have it both ways.
(or maybe he does.)
should be, could be, would be...
I hope every one of those republicans that voted against it gets replaced!
>>Hard to disagree with what Gaetz said<<
Agree. But this was one that was going to happen so might as well get on board.
The time to kill both DOEs when we retake the Presidency the House and the Senate.
Did you even read Matt Gaetz statement/explanation for his vote, at OP??
Or, did you simply knee jerk reply?
I believe Matt’s dad was once a FL School district Superintendent, as well as FL Senate....who pushed laws, beneficial to FL school families, if I read that correctly.
He may have some better insight, than you do, on this.
Just sayin’.
Thank you for the tip, Jane.
I will take a look.
I’m with Gaetz. I think I held that position before he was born.
Be real and be mature about it, BobL, it ain’t passing the Senate and Biden ain’t signing it.
The guy yesterday admitted that China is spying and nothing. Nothing from those clowns.
I think he just prefers Massie’s bill.
The US Dept of EDU shall be terminated.
YW.
Here is a surprisingly positive article...minus the requisite leftist slant, about Don Gaetz, from Polutico....
https://www.politico.com/states/florida/story/2021/04/17/matt-gaetzs-daddy-issues-1375630
Yes....Matt explains this, disbanding the horrid Dept of Education quest, in the OP.
Gaetz has it right, because federal involvement in education — PERIOD — is unconstitutional. If Florida proposed a similar law, I would support it wholeheartedly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.