Posted on 03/23/2023 2:50:41 PM PDT by fwdude
In a shocking undercover video released Tuesday, New Mexicans learned why attempts to get education officials to listen to concerns about critical race theory, transgender indoctrination, masking children, and school lockdowns have been such an uphill battle: New Mexico state officials have trained teachers and school boards that parents have no rights when it comes to their kids.
“Parental rights end when you decide to send your kids to public school,” claimed attorney, Andrew Sanchez (below), who conducted a recent training session for New Mexico teachers and school board members in Bernalillo County.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Yup.
In loco parentis.
Note to parents: Ignorance is not a good look.
“responsibility of a school’s staff to be acting “in loco parentis” (Latin term)”
Still true, but denied by the socialist insurrection and arrogance of progressives.
Thank you. I’m humbled. I’m just a dopey guy who values freedom with a gift for gab.
Anyone giving attribution to FR can hot link to my rant at
https://freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/4140381/posts?page=38#38.
They can also open the HTML source code of this page and copy and past my post.
As long as they give attribution to FreeRepublic, feel free to post far and wide.
You’re right...it’s more than that. In America government is accountable to it’s *citizens*. Time to remind them.
Thanks.
Estrada is well aware of roughly a century of U.S. Supreme Court case law supporting parents’ right to direct the upbringing of their children. But he and other amendment proponents say such a change to the Constitution is still desirable.
And,
Still, the decision rang alarm bells among some conservatives and parental rights advocates, in part because of a dissent by Justice Antonin Scalia that raised doubts about whether Meyer, Pierce, and another decision, Wisconsin v. Yoder, which in 1972 recognized Amish parents’ right to end their children’s schooling after 8th grade, deserved respect as precedents.
Scalia suggested parents’ right to control their children’s upbringing was an “unenumerated right” that was not the province of the judiciary to enforce. As Scalia described it to a law school audience in 2015, such a parental right is “simply not in the Constitution.”Still, the decision rang alarm bells among some conservatives and parental rights advocates, in part because of a dissent by Justice Antonin Scalia that raised doubts about whether Meyer, Pierce, and another decision, Wisconsin v. Yoder, which in 1972 recognized Amish parents’ right to end their children’s schooling after 8th grade, deserved respect as precedents.
The left is deeply ingrained in our public school systems. Unfortunately, I don't think there are enough people behind this issue to make Parental Rights a Constitutional Amendment.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.