Posted on 02/24/2023 6:45:36 AM PST by Ozguy1945
Some people think Tulsi Gabbard would be a great running mate for President Trump in 2024.
Some conservatives are appalled by that.
Her start was with Bernie Sanders, but in her post-Congress career she has spoken at CPAP, stood in for Tucker Carlson and campaigned for Republicans in the midterms.
In recent years she has taken a pro-life position on abortion and always angered liberals with her traditional gender identity views.
Her service in military police suggests the skills and personality that might help drain the swamp
Her criticism of Biden's warmongering, of cancel culture and of attacks on freedom sound as good to me as anyone's.
She's a babe.
She can ride a wave.
And she demolished Kamala Harris in the Democrat debates.
She is no Reagan yet.
But her Time For Choosing moment could come any day.
How do you feel about killing babies as a policy?
I am pro-life. Many of my family and friends are not. It doesn’t mean that I don’t love them.
I take the Boortz approach.
Not Guilty! (She’s a babe)
When transitioning from Democrat into a more conservative mode, perhaps taking the tiny baby steps of change is the most practical course. Tulsi Gabbard is, bit by bit, becoming a REAL American, a movement I much approve of and admire. Not yet a Republican, and she may never make the move, but a voice being raised on behalf of what many of her fellow citizens already believe.
For a while, those used to mean the same thing. But the Democrat Party went all totalitarian and elitist.
My grandfathers were both professional theologians.
Christians undoubtedly have the right to vote Christian.
But if Tulsi were number two on the Republican ticket to either Trump or DeSantis, I would not count her Hinduism as a good reason to vote for a second term.of Biden.
How do you feel about killing babies as a policy?
Simple question for you, if Biden were actively pro-life, would your opinion of him change? No other issue change, just that. Just a Rush style question.
Well yeah, I don’t think a Hindu would be worse than someone pushing the gay agenda and selling out America.
But surely we can put up better choices.
There’s something not quite right about her mentally.
Sure. In 1980 Reagan was ready.
But the landmark beacon of A Time For Choosing was in 1964.
And yes, pedophiles can be pro-life, that was my own father.
Point being, Reagan paid his dues.
Dear Tulsi fangirls:
Ban “assault weapons” (whatever that is)
Pay reparations
Ban fossil fuels
Citizenship for illegals
Medicare for all
Eliminate Electoral College
What in the world are you doing here, if you think you’d vote for this? I don’t get so many “conservatives” who think she’s a viable choice. She’s not.
On November 7 last year Texas Right To Life published this about her .....
She is a young woman still learning.
As Reagan did at General Electric.
She says some very sensible things, but isn’t she one of Klaus Schwab’s protégés?
She needs 20 years of doing something to develop
I would give him credit for one dimension of morality.
Agree. I don't vote for them either.
May as well vote on the appearance attribute nowadays. Not many politicians have core values anymore.
It’s a trap.
She’s attractive but she’s merely a reasonable lib
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.