Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Appeals court denies principal qualified immunity in teacher's MAGA hat job retaliation lawsuit
Just the News ^ | Updated: December 30, 2022 - 11:37pm | Greg Piper

Posted on 12/31/2022 10:48:36 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum

A suburban Portland, Ore., teacher allegedly threatened with discipline if he kept bringing a Make America Great Again hat to teacher-training sessions can sue his former principal for First Amendment retaliation, a federal appeals court has ruled. 

The 9th Circuit partially reinstated Eric Dodge's lawsuit on Thursday, finding that former Wy'east Middle School Principal Caroline Garrett would not be protected by qualified immunity if a jury found her guilty of violating Dodge's First Amendment rights on the eve of the 2019-2020 school year.

The three-judge panel cited "clearly established … long-standing precedent" that concerns about "the reaction to controversial or disfavored speech itself does not justify restricting such speech." 

The unanimous opinion by Judge Danielle Forrest said "it was patently unreasonable for Principal Garrett to believe that she could restrict Dodge’s speech to quell what was, in reality, nothing more than the natural effect that disfavored political speech often has on those with different viewpoints."

It upheld the lower court's dismissal of Vancouver's Evergreen School District and chief human resource officer Janae Gomes from the suit.

The appeals court scoffed at the district's argument that Dodge was "not conveying a political message" of support for then-President Trump through the hat but only using it to "protect his skin," so Garrett could require him to keep it in his car.

(Excerpt) Read more at justthenews.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 12/31/2022 10:48:36 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The constitution is not a constitution if government administrators can ignore it with impunity. Qualified immunity needs to be limited.


2 posted on 12/31/2022 10:52:31 AM PST by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

What’s wrong with these people who want to make America great?
And the want other countries to be great,too.


3 posted on 12/31/2022 10:52:42 AM PST by Leep (Hillary will NEVER be president! 😁)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

BLM hat is a acceptable, pride hat is acceptable, drag queen hat is acceptable, I would even go as far as to say a Nazi hat would be acceptable


4 posted on 12/31/2022 10:54:46 AM PST by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Why would a high school principal ever be covered by qualified immunity?


5 posted on 12/31/2022 10:58:02 AM PST by Husker24 (Pp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Are these liberals that stupid? Denying freedom of speech is the stupidest thing these idiots can do.


6 posted on 12/31/2022 11:04:33 AM PST by DownInFlames (P)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun
BLM hat is a acceptable, pride hat is acceptable, drag queen hat is acceptable, I would even go as far as to say a Nazi hat would be acceptable

Try on a White Lives Matter hat or T-shirt and you'll get beat up.

7 posted on 12/31/2022 11:08:13 AM PST by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The National Socialist Party loses another one.


8 posted on 12/31/2022 11:20:15 AM PST by bray (The Republic of Texas explains everything )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum; All
"Appeals court denies principal qualified immunity [emphasis added] in teacher's MAGA hat job retaliation lawsuit

Even online definition of "qualified immunity" indicates that this politically correct immunity has "reasonable" limits.

"In the United States, qualified immunity is a legal principle that grants government officials performing discretionary (optional) functions immunity from civil suits unless the plaintiff shows that the official violated "clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known [!!! emphasis added]." —Qualified immunity

So I'm not sure what the referenced principal actually qualifies for. /semi-sarc

9 posted on 12/31/2022 11:20:55 AM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I wonder how many Obama posters are still up in classrooms across America? I bet it numbers in thousands.


10 posted on 12/31/2022 11:41:00 AM PST by volunbeer (We are living 2nd Thessalonians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Hope the guy get’s a sizable judgment against her personally. Her arrogant and bigoted attitude should cost her dearly.


11 posted on 12/31/2022 11:45:07 AM PST by Dave911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

When did Vancouver, WA become part of Portland, OR?


12 posted on 12/31/2022 11:49:05 AM PST by HartleyMBaldwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

but only using it to “protect his skin,” so Garrett could require him to keep it in his car.


The district could expect him to abide by common courtesies and not wear it on his head while sitting in meetings, but even then they could not require him to keep it in his car, or even remove it from the room.


13 posted on 12/31/2022 11:59:52 AM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Franklin

Qualified immunity is a dirtbag third-world despots way of ignoring accountability and proving that the audacity of criminal-run courts are the mendacious clowns running it has no standing to exist clearly as Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 (1886)


14 posted on 12/31/2022 12:30:27 PM PST by SERE_DOC ( The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it. TJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Sue the living daylight out of whomever possible. It’s a shame tax dollars will be wasted but in the grand scheme of things, this is what can alter abhorrent behavior.


15 posted on 12/31/2022 1:23:37 PM PST by daku
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Am I the only one who thought that the title is some encrypted code?


16 posted on 12/31/2022 3:50:46 PM PST by Bikkuri (I am proud to be a PureBlood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson