Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Allows Dems in House to Obtain Trump’s Tax Returns So They Can Review How IRS Audits Presidents
The Gateway Pundit ^ | November 22, 2022 | ProTrumpNews Staff

Posted on 11/22/2022 5:09:29 PM PST by Macho MAGA Man

On October 31st, Trump asked the Supreme Court to block the House Ways and Means Committee from getting six years of his tax returns.

.... Snip.....

That request has been denied by the Supreme Court.

Fox News reported:

But on Tuesday, Roberts formally denied the request.

“The application for stay of the mandate presented to The Chief Justice and by him referred to the Court is denied,” the order states. “The order heretofore entered by The Chief Justice is vacated.”

The House Ways and Means Committee first requested six years of Trump’s tax returns in 2019.

Trump’s tax records are currently in the hands of the Treasury Department, which had held off releasing them pending final court action.

They denied the request without comment – no dissents were noted.

USA Today reported:

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: gaywaypundit; justiceroberts; rehash; sodomyblog; supremecourt; tds; trump; trumptaxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last
To: All

.
Every Republican should’ve been on TV on Biden‘s 80th birthday.

Drawing attention to his crazy statements and repeated lies.

Once, again, they support it let Joe off the hook.

Son of a bitch, the man investigating Hunter got fired.


41 posted on 11/22/2022 6:27:27 PM PST by AnthonySoprano (Statute of Limitations is going to elapse on Hunter Biden )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SpokeshaveReturns

Add-in Schuuuuuuuuumer, Hoyer, Romney, McCarthy, etc.


42 posted on 11/22/2022 6:38:24 PM PST by Carriage Hill (A society grows great when old men plant trees, in whose shade they know they will never sit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Report proves one thing; IRS can do what ever they please to anyone, anywhere, anytime. Now arm the 87,000 new agents and they will make the Gestapo look like kids play.


43 posted on 11/22/2022 6:38:42 PM PST by chopperk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Traitor Roberts has been a Trump H8ter [bigly] for a long time.


44 posted on 11/22/2022 6:39:09 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

I hope Trump can stall things until the new House is seated in January.

However, the law says that Congress has the right to review any person’s tax return:

Section 6103(f)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) reads:

Upon written request from the chairman of the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives, the chairman of the Committee on Finance of the Senate, or the chairman of the Joint Committee on Taxation, the Secretary [of the Treasury] shall furnish such committee with any return or return information specified in such request, except that any return or return information which can be associated with, or otherwise identify, directly or indirectly, a particular taxpayer shall be furnished to such committee only when sitting in closed executive session unless such taxpayer otherwise consents in writing to such disclosure.


45 posted on 11/22/2022 7:06:22 PM PST by Roadrunner383 (;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

The communists want these tax returns so they can get all the information about everyone whoever dealt with President Trump. The death threats and doxing by the communists RATS will start in a couple weeks.


46 posted on 11/22/2022 7:18:12 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (You can vote your way into socialism but you have to shoot your way out. Remember that Snowflakes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Just in the nick of time. Now the Dems can order up a Special Council to - never mind. . .


47 posted on 11/22/2022 7:25:14 PM PST by MCSETots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

I’m sure the Dems will allow DJT to amend his tax returns if there any issues. Just like they did for the Clintons . . .


48 posted on 11/22/2022 7:27:20 PM PST by MCSETots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Now that we know the rules, I’m sure that McCarthy’s first acts as Speaker will be to demand The tax returns of Biden (both), Obama, Clinton, Pelosi, Schumer.

Nah, not gonna happen.
Just like impeachments.


49 posted on 11/22/2022 7:41:16 PM PST by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

It makes me sick what the Democrats are constantly doing to this man. He is so above board that they can’t find anything to charge him with, so they just keep searching and searching hoping to find some teensy weensy questionable act. I hope when the Republicans take the House that they will want to see how the IRS audits Biden’s tax returns.


50 posted on 11/22/2022 9:52:04 PM PST by KittyKares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KittyKares

I agree. It’s truly terrible.


51 posted on 11/22/2022 9:53:22 PM PST by Macho MAGA Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Oh no! This is sooo terrible!! Ha ha ha ha ! They will find noting in Trump’s tax returns and this ruling now makes to harder for Joey to keep HIS tax returns secret.

Things aren’t always - no seldom are - what they seem to be in Washington politics.

The only people upset about this are the uninitiated who know nothing but what they are fed and the Occupy White House gang.


52 posted on 11/23/2022 3:59:02 AM PST by jmaroneps37 (Freedom is never free. It must be won rewon and jealously guarded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

Run Donald Jr. or Eric as proxy POTUS?


53 posted on 11/23/2022 4:39:14 AM PST by WeaslesRippedMyFlesh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

Biden has already released his taxes though.


54 posted on 11/23/2022 6:58:56 AM PST by Fuzz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: HippyLoggerBiker
"4) Now has Supreme Court precedence to look at Brandon’s Tax Returns"

I'm not so sure of that. If this request was granted to investigate how Presidential tax returns are handled, then that justification might only be granted once.

55 posted on 11/23/2022 9:01:19 AM PST by The Duke (Never Retreat, Never Surrender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Macho MAGA Man

They denied the request without comment

Key word owned for their no comment


56 posted on 11/23/2022 9:37:09 AM PST by Vaduz (LAWYERS )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

“Holy smokes how the hell do the rats to have a right to a persons tax records?”

Federal statute.


57 posted on 11/23/2022 1:16:29 PM PST by TexasGator (!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator; All

Well now we know. TexasGator is Adam Schiff.


58 posted on 11/23/2022 1:54:54 PM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

Roberts is a homo


sapien


59 posted on 11/23/2022 2:12:53 PM PST by AirForceVet1988 ("As the pattern gets more intricate and subtle, being swept along is no longer enough.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa; All
"The 16th amendment was ratified 1913."

Thanks for replying Raycpa.

Regardless of the 16th Amendment (16A), it remains that the states have never expressly constitutionally given the federal government the specific power to dictate, regulate, tax and spend in the name of INTRAstate healthcare, no mention of national healthcare in 16A.

In fact, federal military healthcare aside, the rest of this post shows clarifications of no express constitutional federal government power to tax and spend for national healthcare by respected constitutional experts (the misguided Supreme Court got Obamacare wrong imo). Clarifications include excerpts from Supreme Court case opinions where justices used healthcare as an example of a power that the states have never expressly constitutionally given to the feds.

But most importantly for this 16A-related discussion, the very last excerpt in this post, from Linder v. United States, 1925, a clarification that the states have obviously never expressly constitutionally given Congress the specific, express power to dictate, regulate, tax and spend for intrastate healthcare purposes (my wording), was decided roughly 12 years after 16A was ratified.

And 16A did not add any new powers to Congress's constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers, that amendment effectively only widening Congress's original power to appropriate taxes.

Here's the start of expert clarifications that the states have never expressly constitutional given the feds the specific power to establish a national healthcare program.

Finally, arguably the final nail in the coffin that the states have never expressly constitutional given the feds the specific power to tax and spend for a national healthcare program regardless of 16A, please consider the following.

Misguided Speaker Pelosi had repeatedly ignored a repeatedly submitted proposal by former Rep. Jessie Jackson Jr., for House to pass a referendum to propose a healthcare amendment to the Constitution to the states.

If I remember correctly, she ignored Jackson Jr. proposal both before and after she irresponsibly rammed Obamacare bill through the House, such an amendment necessary for making Obamacare constitutional imo.

Next, below are excerpts from Supreme Court case opinions and congressional record that don't mention unique state power to stop contagious diseases with quarantine, but support the constitutional reality that peacetime healthcare issues, politically correct (imo) mandating of masks argued to slow spread of contagious diseases for example, is a state power issue, not the business of the feds.


60 posted on 11/23/2022 3:27:58 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson