Posted on 11/04/2022 7:00:57 PM PDT by bitt
An in-depth look into the apparent bias against True The Vote by Judge Hoyt in a Civil Hearing.
On Monday, True The Vote’s Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips were taken into custody after a Contempt Hearing in the Konnech v True The Vote defamation case, which after reading the transcripts, had very little to do with defamation at all. Both Catherine and Gregg refused to leak the name of the third Confidential Informant that was in the hotel room when Gregg Phillips was being shown the PII located on a Konnech database in China, and as a result, were sent to the Joe Corley Detention Center.
Gregg and Catherine have been held in solitary confinement for refusing to release a CI’s name (which is illegal).
I wanted to write this article to highlight the biased and hypocrisy that Judge Hoyt has shown in the courtroom against True The Vote. I have followed many proceedings and witnessed how Judge Sullivan treated General Flynn throughout his trials. I listened to every hearing and read every transcript, and I believe both Judge Sullivan and Judge Hoyt are cut from the same cloth.
What I am about to show you is shocking; this double standard approach from the Judicial System must end.
From the start of this case, Judge Hoyt has had it out for True The Vote. Hoyt has been extremely doubtful towards True The Vote, disrespectful to the defendants and their legal team, often speaking over the defense and not allowing the defendants a chance to speak. Hoyt has allowed this case to become very political.
Citizens in this Nation are innocent until proven guilty — especially in a Civil Case.
Time and time again, Judge Hoyt seems to disregard True The Vote’s concerns as if their lives do not matter.
Below is an exert from the original TRO hearing where True The Vote’s Attorney (Mr. Akers) describes the fears of releasing a confidential informant’s name that could peak the interest of the Chinese Communist Party. Judge Hoyt immediately disregards these fears as if they do not exist in reality.
...more
p
Alex Jones was the proof-of-concept of this type of trial.
I know a lot of people have contempt for Alex Jones, but that’s because the only thing they know about him is what the lying gaslight press told them, and they are not capable of thinking for themselves and believe the gaslight press because they’re intellectual sloths.
Still think you can vote your way out of this ?
You are correct in your statement concerning the Alex Jones trial. It’s my hope that the verdict will be overturned by a higher court.
Free speech has been turned upside down and is now defined as “speech approved by the government”. Freedom of the the press is now defined as the “corporate media whose messaging is approved by the government”.
The rights of freedom of speech in our Constitution was incorporated for the express purpose that government officials could not not punish you for your opinions and for speaking those opinions loudly. Much as freedom of religion does not mean that you have the right to only have your religion opinions at home or simply in your mind. You should be able to speak and hold true to those opinions in your daily life.
These rights are inherently ours and do not depend on the government’s permission to exercise those rights. Rights are not “given” by the government, they are ours from the beginning of our existence.
Hoyt is simply the latest example of the ignorant and biased politicized judges that refused to consider the evidence of blatant election fraud presented to them after the 2020 election. They knew Trump needed to be defeated by any means necessary and they gamed the law just like the election officials rigged the election to suit their convictions.
The tragedy is that incompetent bigots like this are all too easily reelected by the clueless public in most states. They are loyal hacks who get put on the ballot by the Dems every cycle. The public has no idea how stupid they really are until they have to stand in their courtroom like Catherine and Greg.
Also, the fact that we often have to pay for our rights is repugnant and against the Constitution. To have to expend large amounts of money to hire attorneys to defend you for simply speaking your opinion or exercising your right to keep and bear arms, is ridiculous.
There should be strict penalties for violating civil rights. The sovereign immunity laws allow officials to violate our rights without any punishment. And, those lose have gradually morphed to the point you have to ask permission of the State to be able to sue those who have violated your rights. The Courts need to fix those laws. We should be able to sue officials personally for those violations without them being able to hide behind the “I was just doing my job” defense.
/rant off
Political prisoners of the Deep State.
Clearly political.
Judge Hoyt demands that the informant be outed for retaliation.
Yes, Beijing by way of Konnech, wants the name of the informant who exposed its takeover of US elections.
later
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.