Posted on 10/22/2022 4:49:30 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
The last shred of hope for holding Big Pharma accountable for fraud now rests on a lawsuit against vaccine manufacturer Pfizer. In an update provided to Becker News, a judge is soon expected to issue his ruling on whether or not the ‘Pfizergate’ fraud case proceeds to trial.
“The judge is deciding, as I type, whether we go to discovery or the case is dismissed,” Pfizer whistleblower Brook Jackson tells Becker News.
After the CDC this week voted to add the Covid shots to its Childhood Vaccines Schedule, under the PREP Act, it has effectively been granted legal immunity to lawsuits. There is no legal immunity if Pfizer committed fraud, however.
In September, Pfizer whistleblower Brook Jackson came forward with her explosive report about the company’s alleged malfeasance, citing ‘falsified data’ and manipulated clinical trials. In January, she filed a lawsuit against Pfizer for committing fraud against the American people, In February, the judge ruled that the lawsuit, being led by attorney Robert Barnes, can proceed to pre-trial discovery phase. It is now on the verge of potentially going to trial.
Brook Jackson is a former clinical trial auditor who was fired after raising her concerns. She first came forward with inside information and documented evidence about Pfizer’s operations in a BMJ investigation conducted by Paul Thacker. The report raises serious red flags that the FDA and Pfizer engaged in massive fraud to justify vaccine mandates.
Is it a competent and honest judge, or is it a Democrat?
A problem with operation warp speed? Gosh no. Can’t wait for the Republicans to give us more government solutions like the vax.
I wanna believe it will be so-
Is some judges family about to be Arkancided?
Looks like the Pfizer trolls have hit the keywords pretty hard already.
The theory supposedly is that it is not fraud if FedGov basically knew it was happening and more or less conveyed the message: “Lie to us, please.”
FedGov is deeply complicit in the crime w/ Pfizer, Moderna and J&J, etc.
I’ll say a prayer.
By the way, are you thirsty?
Yeah, that’s not a workable theory.
Had heard that it at least one of the offending companies has already articulated it in some way to a court, in the manner of a defense, or some kind of denial of wrongdoing. Seems reed thin, but what else do they have?
This judge, like all the other judges who have declined to hear legitimate cases involving the big steal and the China virus genocide and where it originated and now big Pharma’s dangerous and sometimes deadly clot shot, will be offered either gold or lead. Cowards and traitors them all! I wish I could say differently but I have no confidence that this judge or the next will be any different.
Actually, Pfizer will be a convenient scapegoat. And they certainly share blame.
But will NIH, CDC, Fauci and all the officials who forced them down our throats ever pay a price?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.