Posted on 09/26/2022 8:13:23 AM PDT by bitt
A short collection of key pieces of evidence showing the COVID vaccines are not "safe and effective." Not even close. They are the most deadly vaccines we've ever produced.
Here’s a high level collection of some of the most compelling pieces of evidence I’ve seen to date. This is not an exhaustive list, but just the key pieces of data that are impossible to explain if the vaccines are safe and effective.
...more..
I’ve divided the collection into sections and I’ve tried to limit each section to the most compelling data points. So don’t be disappointed if your favorite item isn’t mentioned in this article; I wanted to keep it short enough to be read..
I’ll try to keep this updated over time. It can be found in the Reference section of my Substack.
The phase 3 clinical trial data
The Pfizer trial 6 month report showed absolutely no all-cause morbidity or mortality benefit. There were no all-cause benefits at all. It was all negative. Ask your doctor why you should take a new, unproven medical intervention that is not shown to have an overall benefit. Even if there was a benefit of fewer COVID infections (which is seriously suspect due to the gaming below), the fact that the total all-cause numbers for both mortality and morbidity were negative means the intervention should not be recommended by any doctor.
The Pfizer trial 6 month report showed that more people died (and were injured) who got the drug than who got the placebo. In other words, the cure was worse than the disease. The drug maker claimed that none of the people in the vaccine group were killed by the vaccine. They do not reveal the tests they did and explain how they were able to make that assessment. Why the secrecy here, especially in light of the study by Bhakdi and Burkhardt showing that trained medical examiners missed the causality link in 93% of the cases they looked at? The Pfizer vaccine had 4X as many cardiac arrests in the treatment group than the placebo (see page 12 of the Supplemental Appendix). This lines up very well with the numerous cardiac-related problems related to the vaccine as documented in the study by Retsef Levi and in the VAERS data which showed that the “cardiac arrest” reports were elevated by a factor of 93X higher than the annual baseline rate (VAERS reports from all vaccines combined in previous years). For some reason, the CDC wasn’t able to detect that signal (it was only 100 times higher than normal so they ignored it for some reason; they won’t let me ask them about it). In short, the claims from the manufacturer that none of the deaths were caused by the vaccine are highly suspect since all the evidence for those claims remains hidden from public view for some reason.
All of his claims are based on copious evidence. There has been zero argument with the evidence, simply the pejorative label ‘dangerous claims and erratic behavior’.
Many corporate cowards don’t want to be called ‘anti-vax’.
Find an argument with the evidence.
Stop calling them vaccines!
servantoftheservant wrote: “All of his claims are based on copious evidence. There has been zero argument with the evidence, simply the pejorative label ‘dangerous claims and erratic behavior’.”
Simply untrue.
https://healthfeedback.org/authors/steve-kirsch/
“As Kirsch has gone deeper into the anti-vaccine scene, many professional associates have increasingly distanced themselves from him. In May, all 12 members of CETF’s scientific advisory board resigned, citing his alarming dangerous claims and erratic behavior. Over the summer, the conflict reached his most recent startup, M10. Its board told him that if he wanted to remain part of the company he would have to stop making public anti-vaccine statements. In September, he resigned as CEO and gave up his board seat.”
“In May, all 12 members of CETF’s scientific advisory board resigned, citing his alarming dangerous claims and erratic behavior.”
What, exactly, are the ‘dangerous claims’?
Is there an evidentiary argument that counters the scientific studies Kirsch relies on? LOL
servantoftheservant wrote: “What, exactly, are the ‘dangerous claims’? Is there an evidentiary argument that counters the scientific studies Kirsch relies on? LOL”
Doesn’t it give you pause that all 12 members of his technical advisors of his technical board resigned over what they characterized as his “alarming dangerous claims and erratic behavior”.
Then shortly thereafter the board of another of his startup companies, M10, “told him that if he wanted to remain part of the company he would have to stop making public anti-vaccine statements.”
These are troubling statements that reflect directly upon whether one should believe Kirsch.
There is a code of Orwellian ‘right-think’ vigorously enforced in corporate America. Being associated with ‘wrong-think’ is career limiting. It doesn’t surprise me at all that advisors that rely on corporate money would resign.
Saying the vax is neither effective nor safe is like saying the Emperor has no clothes. It’s true, but the bots are shocked and dismayed.
servantoftheservant wrote: “Saying the vax is neither effective nor safe is like saying the Emperor has no clothes. It’s true, but the bots are shocked and dismayed.”
Saying the vaccines are ineffective and dangerous is far more career limiting since corporations do not wish to be associated with those who believe in vaccine/virus conspiracies.
He believed the wrong people.
Copious scientific data show the vax is neither safe nor effective. Kirsch has simply posted these studies and their inescapable conclusion.
Argue with the data instead repeating platitudes like some retarded Maoist. LOL
“. Kirsch has simply posted these studies”
LOL! That global warming Gore supporting dude has perpetuated unbased conspiracies.
Hello TexasGator, Not sure if you are advocating that the MRNA Covid 19 vaccines are both safe and effective.
Please parse your argument.
Which study on vaccine efficacy that Kirsch posted is false and why?
“Which study on vaccine efficacy that Kirsch posted is false and why?”.
Pick one and we can discuss.
“Argue with the data”
With Kirsch it is Parse the Data
Kirsch said that the shots affected Biden’s brain. Maybe they also affected Kirsch’s.
LOL. You’re not serious.
Is it your position that the MRNA Covid vaccines are both safe and effective?
YOU pick one. You’re the one who has an issue with an unnamed study posted by Kirsch.
I find Kirsch’s Substack to be quite solid and persuasive on the topic of MRNA Covid ‘vaccines’.
“YOU pick one. You’re the one who has an issue with an unnamed study posted by Kirsch.”
I didn’t bring up his “studies”. You did.
Are you mentally retarded?
I brought up the studies Kirsch has posted in response to Dugway Duke who mentioned Kirsch’s ‘dangerous claims’ in relation to Covid vaccines.
What are the ‘dangerous claims’ unsupported by scientific data, and why are they dangerous?
I can see this is a struggle for you. Best wishes.
“I brought up the studies Kirsch “
That is what I said. You brought them up, not me.
“Thousands of paid subscribers”
If Kirsch is so rich, why is requiring payments to read his stupid newsletter?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.