What, exactly, are the ‘dangerous claims’?
Is there an evidentiary argument that counters the scientific studies Kirsch relies on? LOL
servantoftheservant wrote: “What, exactly, are the ‘dangerous claims’? Is there an evidentiary argument that counters the scientific studies Kirsch relies on? LOL”
Doesn’t it give you pause that all 12 members of his technical advisors of his technical board resigned over what they characterized as his “alarming dangerous claims and erratic behavior”.
Then shortly thereafter the board of another of his startup companies, M10, “told him that if he wanted to remain part of the company he would have to stop making public anti-vaccine statements.”
These are troubling statements that reflect directly upon whether one should believe Kirsch.