servantoftheservant wrote: “All of his claims are based on copious evidence. There has been zero argument with the evidence, simply the pejorative label ‘dangerous claims and erratic behavior’.”
Simply untrue.
https://healthfeedback.org/authors/steve-kirsch/
“As Kirsch has gone deeper into the anti-vaccine scene, many professional associates have increasingly distanced themselves from him. In May, all 12 members of CETF’s scientific advisory board resigned, citing his alarming dangerous claims and erratic behavior. Over the summer, the conflict reached his most recent startup, M10. Its board told him that if he wanted to remain part of the company he would have to stop making public anti-vaccine statements. In September, he resigned as CEO and gave up his board seat.”
“In May, all 12 members of CETF’s scientific advisory board resigned, citing his alarming dangerous claims and erratic behavior.”
What, exactly, are the ‘dangerous claims’?
Is there an evidentiary argument that counters the scientific studies Kirsch relies on? LOL