Posted on 09/11/2022 8:07:14 AM PDT by SpeedyInTexas
This list only includes destroyed vehicles and equipment of which photo or videographic evidence is available. Therefore, the amount of equipment destroyed is significantly higher than recorded here. Small arms, ATGMs, MANPADS, loitering munitions, drones used as unmanned bait, civilian vehicles, trailers and derelict equipment are not included in this list. All possible effort has gone into avoiding duplicate entries and discerning the status of equipment between captured or abandoned. Many of the entries listed as 'abandoned' will likely end up captured or destroyed. Similarly, some of the captured equipment might be destroyed if it can't be recovered. When the origin of a piece of equipment can't be established, it is not included in the list. The Soviet flag is used when the equipment in question was produced prior to 1991. This list is constantly updated as additional footage becomes available.
(Excerpt) Read more at oryxspioenkop.com ...
You read that from the propaganda spewing Western/UK/US/EU/NATO Reuters news site that you like to link to when it suits you crank?
I presume you have read little military history.
Armies advancing 50 miles per day are not armies taking high casualties.
High casualty fighting is the what the Russians went through to take Izyum. That was 2 months of street by street urban warfare.
That it took only two days for Ukraine to take it back shows that the Russians dropped their rifles and ran as soon as the first shell flew over their heads.
Indeed.
‘Europe Is Sacrificing Its Ancient Forests for Energy’
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/09/07/world/europe/eu-logging-wood-pellets.html
Jokes on you.
So you assert.........
Reports claim otherwise.
Ironic huh?
Oh the biggest propaganda spewing Western/UK/US/EU/NATO of them all, New York Times.
You have no self awareness do you crank?
Agree!
What will they run out of first? Food or ammo?
Do not let them retreat (escape). If they escape, they will lead the Russian counterattack.
I travel through forests regularly and never seen anyone cutting firewood. I have passed many very fine homes that have firewood stacked outside though.
Am I supposed to go to a propaganda spewing Western/UK/US/EU/NATO website or you want to give a relevant quote from your trusted propaganda spewing Western/UK/US/EU/NATO New York Times source?
New UA attacks. Tanks moving forward. They want the Donetsk airport (some reports yesterday they had the airport, but not conclusive).
“Ukrainian army attacking at Pisky, by the Donetsk airport.”
https://twitter.com/pmakela1/status/1568991290418659333
Consensus of what exactly, the overwhelming propaganda spewing Western/UK/US/EU/NATO media which inherently removes 75% of the world’s other media reporting outlets?
As if the Kremlin did not literally invent Fake News.
Sorry, heading out to collect take-that-bad-Putin-and-Russia fire wood in support of Germany, the UK, and the rest of the EU.
Be back later.
Remember when Russia, pronounced that they had taken all of Luhansk?
Well they don’t hold it all anymore.
Remember when we recently had people posting on Free Republic, that there was no way that Russia would ever give up any of the the land that they occupied?
Well they are taking a break on that, until the FSB distributes the new talking points to Gonzosalvo Lira and Loon over Alabama.
Where are the Iranian drones?
Surely those tanks would be sitting ducks for Iranian drones.
Riddle me this: Does the Western/UK/EU/NATO/US propaganda media represent the ‘consensus’ of the entire world, bruh?
Simple question.
““Ukrainian army attacking at Pisky, by the Donetsk airport.””
Comments say that attack was from 2-3 days ago. And failed.
Control of Donetsk airport still seems up in the air.
Sorry, heading out to collect take-that-bad-Putin-and-Russia fire wood in support of Germany, the UK, and the rest of the EU.You would be lucky to live in the German homes I seen that have stacks of firewood.
Be back later.
But while you are doing that - try to think of a reasonable answer as why you rant about "propaganda spewing Western/UK/US/EU/NATO media" at people but then post links to Washington Post, CNN and Reuters. Heck you couldn't even stop yourself from posting a New York Times link even when I am laughing in your crank face about it - LOL!
“Where are the Iranian drones?”
RuZZia doesn’t seem to be impressed with them
“Russia Imported Iranian Drones That Malfunction in Battle”
https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/aviation/a41042947/russia-imports-iranian-drones/
You dont get out to true rural areas of Germany do you?
City dweller, should have known.
Enjoy them community heating houses and such.
Riddle me this: Does the Western/UK/EU/NATO/US propaganda media represent the ‘consensus’ of the entire world, bruh?Yes, when it suits cranked, they very much do.
Simple question.
“The wreckage of a Russian Su-25SM air support jet (RF-95134, 04 White) was found in #Kharkiv Oblast.
Apparently, this is the jet which was shot down by a Ukrainian MANPADS 4 days ago, but it still requires additional confirmation.”
https://twitter.com/UAWeapons/status/1568982695862046722
You have no answer about your trusted media links and why others can’t use them.
You know... Washington Post, CNN, Reuters and The New York Times.
Are you an American citizen cranked?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.