Skip to comments.
How the Founders' original design would affect the US Senate
American Thinker ^
| August 28, 2022
| J.H. Capron
Posted on 08/28/2022 11:01:14 AM PDT by ScaniaBoy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
To: Amendment10
Bump for later reading. I always learn so much from your posts.
41
posted on
08/28/2022 2:13:08 PM PDT
by
boxlunch
(Red State governors, kick the fednazis OUT of red states! )
To: ScaniaBoy; Jacquerie
After the passage of the 17th amendment, ask yourself this:
“What purpose does the U.S. Senate serve?”
“Why does it even exist?”
42
posted on
08/28/2022 2:15:08 PM PDT
by
Repeal The 17th
(Get out of the matrix and get a real life.)
To: Repeal The 17th
The Senate’s foundation doesn’t support its purpose.
43
posted on
08/28/2022 2:17:22 PM PDT
by
Jacquerie
(ArticleVBlog.com)
To: who_would_fardels_bear
Figures YOU would have a problem with the obvious disaster the 17th amendment has been. Wow. New low.
44
posted on
08/28/2022 2:19:44 PM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
To: qaz123
The 17th amendment has been a disaster. Those denying it look like fools.
45
posted on
08/28/2022 2:21:09 PM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
To: fieldmarshaldj
Oh stop it already. The 17th is a disaster and you know it..
46
posted on
08/28/2022 2:22:30 PM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
To: metmom
It ias amazing how clueless some Freepers really are. The 17th is a disaster in progress.
47
posted on
08/28/2022 2:24:55 PM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
To: central_va
One person put it better than anyone.
It’s a club and you/we ain’t in it.
48
posted on
08/28/2022 2:33:29 PM PDT
by
qaz123
To: central_va; BillyBoy; Impy
It was a disaster before. You want politicians choosing your elected Senators for you ? I certainly don’t. You’re not going to get statesmen again with the hacks in the legislatures picking them, you’ll get more hacks.
49
posted on
08/28/2022 2:43:24 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(America Owes Anita Bryant An Enormous Apology)
To: Jacquerie
One House is apportioned by population. The other gives each state equal representation. One answers to rural and agricultural interests, and the other to urban interests. There’s your logic. Senators usuallly have to answer to a larger electorate than representatives. Also, it’s easier for nutjobs to become representatives than senators.
50
posted on
08/28/2022 2:57:54 PM PDT
by
x
To: x
Check out the link in #28.
51
posted on
08/28/2022 3:27:04 PM PDT
by
Jacquerie
(ArticleVBlog.com)
To: fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy
52
posted on
08/28/2022 3:27:54 PM PDT
by
Impy
("We didn't steal the election, we swear!!!" - Sincerely, The Election Thieves )
To: fieldmarshaldj
"Had their been an instrument in the Constitution allowing for a simple recall of a Senator by the legislature (for failure to follow instructions on how to vote), it would’ve fulfilled more of the Founding Fathers’ vision for that body."Before the 17th., I thought the Governor of the state had the power the recall a Senator at any time.. Am I wrong about that.?
53
posted on
08/28/2022 3:40:19 PM PDT
by
unread
("It's not enough that we do our best; sometimes we have to do what's required." W. Churchill.)
To: Amendment10
Very good.!! Thanks for that... :)
54
posted on
08/28/2022 3:43:27 PM PDT
by
unread
("It's not enough that we do our best; sometimes we have to do what's required." W. Churchill.)
To: unread
No, there was never a power of recall. A Governor could only appoint a Senator in case of a vacancy via resignation or death, and then the legislature would elect a new Senator for the remainder of the term.
55
posted on
08/28/2022 3:45:21 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(America Owes Anita Bryant An Enormous Apology)
To: fieldmarshaldj
You want politicians choosing your elected Senators for you ?Yes, absolutely I do. Most people don't even know the names of their state rep or state senator. This is how little the state ( vs the fed ) means to them. If the 17th is repealed you better damn well believe that would change. A change for the better.
56
posted on
08/28/2022 3:54:59 PM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
To: Impy; fieldmarshaldj
I kinda wish these dopes could get their wish for a few years so they WAKE UP and see for themselves just how incredibly awful the state-appointed Senators would be. Whatever super crooked hacks are appointed for life would suck so bad they'd make slime like Chuck Schumer and Dianne Feinstein look decent by comparison.
It's like how we got cursed out here a few years ago by the Liz Cheney groupies who were pimping her carpetbagging into Wyoming so they could get a "fighter" in Congress.
Well... they CERTAINLY got one!
And NOW they see just "good" things were after daddy's little girl got to be a "fighter" in Washington D.C.!
57
posted on
08/28/2022 4:10:30 PM PDT
by
BillyBoy
(Build Biden Better.)
To: central_va
I wouldn’t. Both my legislators don’t have a collective IQ that adds up to my shoe size, and I have big feet.
58
posted on
08/28/2022 4:16:19 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(America Owes Anita Bryant An Enormous Apology)
To: fieldmarshaldj
Both my legislators don’t have a collective IQ that adds up to my shoe size, and I have big feet.They may now. Repeal the 17th and a higher caliber person runs for state office.
59
posted on
08/28/2022 4:20:55 PM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
To: central_va; Impy; BillyBoy; GOPsterinMA; NFHale; LS; campaignPete R-CT; AuH2ORepublican; ...
No, it won’t. I’m in a (Black) Voter Rights Act district in the State Senate and a White moonbat State House district.
What you want to happen in expecting better people to serve isn’t going to happen, not with a 17th repeal. What it would require would be something exceptionally dramatic, and that would mean returning our nation to being a Republic.
Right now, “Democracy” has failed us by allowing too many people to vote that have no business doing so. Raising the voting age dramatically to at least 30, disallowing those working for their government & gov’t contractors and their families/dependents to vote, disallowing those receiving any government payments, welfare, and the like from voting. Also even disallowing naturalized citizens from voting until they’ve been citizens for at least a decade. You literally have to have skin in the game to have the franchise.
60
posted on
08/28/2022 4:39:46 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(America Owes Anita Bryant An Enormous Apology)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson